» Articles » PMID: 39099185

Best Practices in Wound Care for Gastrointestinal Stoma and Colorectal Cancer Patients from a Nursing Perspective: A Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Int Wound J
Date 2024 Aug 5
PMID 39099185
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Colorectal cancer, a type of colon or bowel cancer, poses a major challenge in the treatment of colorectal lesions. Colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a minimally invasive technique, but the risk of wound infections remains a significant concern. These infections can impede the healing process, affecting daily activities and patient satisfaction. To mitigate the risk of wound infections, various prophylactic measures have been explored, including medication, vaccines, lifestyle adjustments and hygiene practices. This study aims to investigate the prevention of wound infections through prophylactic measures in colorectal EMR. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify prophylactic measures that can prevent wound infections. A systematic literature search was conducted using both free words and search terms. The data extraction was performed after a comprehensive literature screening. The meta-analysis was performed using the metabin function of the meta library in R to evaluate the infection incidences in intervention and control groups. A total of 599 infection incidences were considered, with 267 in intervention and 332 in the control group. The results of meta analysis demonstrated significant reduction of wound incidences following the prophylactic measures (risk ratio [RR] = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6747; 0.9016, I = 78.5%, p < 0.01). The wound infection ratio analysis also exhibited an approximate 6.6% less infection rate in the intervention group, demonstrating significantly less wound infection following the implementation of prophylactic measures. This study highlights the crucial significance of prevention of wound infections by prophylactic measures in colorectal EMR.

Citing Articles

Best practices in wound care for gastrointestinal stoma and colorectal cancer patients from a nursing perspective: A meta-analysis.

Xu J, Gan T Int Wound J. 2024; 21(8):e14908.

PMID: 39099185 PMC: 11298617. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14908.

References
1.
Kobayashi M, Mohri Y, Tonouchi H, Miki C, Nakai K, Kusunoki M . Randomized clinical trial comparing intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis alone with oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of a surgical site infection in colorectal cancer surgery. Surg Today. 2007; 37(5):383-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-006-3410-7. View

2.
Sethi A, Wong Kee Song L . Adverse events related to colonic endoscopic mucosal resection and polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014; 25(1):55-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2014.09.007. View

3.
Krasteva N, Georgieva M . Promising Therapeutic Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Treatment Based on Nanomaterials. Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(6). PMC: 9227901. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14061213. View

4.
Ikeda A, Konishi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y, Nagayama S, Fujimoto Y . Randomized clinical trial of oral and intravenous versus intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Br J Surg. 2016; 103(12):1608-1615. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10281. View

5.
Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S . Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc. 2019; 32(2):219-239. DOI: 10.1111/den.13545. View