» Articles » PMID: 39095403

Failure Patterns and Individualized Treatment Plans of Reirradiation for Inoperable Locally Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Aug 2
PMID 39095403
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Re-irradiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) remains the primary treatment modality for inoperable locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, the rate of radiation-related late adverse effects is often substantially high. Therefore, we aimed to explore failure patterns and individualized treatment plans of re-irradiation for inoperable locally recurrent NPC. Ninety-seven patients who underwent IMRT were retrospectively analyzed. Sixty-two patients had clinical target volume of recurrence (rCTV) delineated, and thirty-five patients had only gross tumor volume of recurrence (rGTV) delineated. Twenty-nine patients developed second local failures after re-irradiation with IMRT (28 cases available). Among those patients, 64.3% (18/28) of patients and 35.7% (10/28) developed in-field or out-field, respectively. No statistical correlation was observed between target volume (rGTV or rCTV) and the local recurrence rate, local failure patterns, grade ≥ 3 toxicity, and survival. Multivariate analysis showed that recurrent T (rT) stage (HR 2.62, P = 0.019) and rGTV volume (HR 1.73, P = 0.037) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Risk stratification based on rT stage and rGTV volume revealed that low risk group had a longer 3-year OS rate (66.7% vs. 23.4%), lower total grade ≥ 3 toxicity (P = 0.004), and lower re-radiation associated mortality rates (HR 0.45, P = 0.03) than high risk group. This study demonstrates that the delineation of rCTV may not be beneficial for re-irradiation using IMRT in locally recurrent NPC. Patients with low risk were most suitable for re-irradiation, with maximizing local salvage and minimizing radiation-related toxicities. More precise and individualized plans of re-irradiation are warranted.

References
1.
Chen Y, Chan A, Le Q, Blanchard P, Sun Y, Ma J . Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet. 2019; 394(10192):64-80. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30956-0. View

2.
Lin S, Pan J, Han L, Guo Q, Hu C, Zong J . Update report of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy and hypothesis of the optimal margin. Radiother Oncol. 2014; 110(3):385-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.01.011. View

3.
Wong K, Hui E, Lo K, Lam W, Johnson D, Li L . Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an evolving paradigm. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021; 18(11):679-695. DOI: 10.1038/s41571-021-00524-x. View

4.
Saraswathula A, London Jr N . Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and the Role of Surgery. J Neurol Surg Rep. 2023; 84(3):e68-e70. PMC: 10344595. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770966. View

5.
Chua M, Ng W, Lee A . Re-irradiation versus surgery for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet Oncol. 2021; 22(6):e217. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00143-1. View