» Articles » PMID: 39093854

Effectiveness and Feasibility of Nerve Real-time Monitoring and Intermittent Monitoring in Endoscopic Thyroidectomy: a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study of 1621 Patients

Overview
Journal Int J Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2024 Aug 2
PMID 39093854
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Protecting recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) and external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN), a crucial indicator for assessing the quality of thyroid surgery, poses a challenge in endoscopic thyroidectomy. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and feasibility of nerve real-time monitoring and intermittent monitoring in endoscopic thyroidectomy.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients underwent endoscopic thyroidectomy were included, and the characteristics and outcomes of real-time monitoring and intermittent monitoring groups were compared. Thereafter, the outcomes of four surgical types (unilateral lobectomy, total thyroidectomy, unilateral lobectomy + lymph node dissection (LND), and total thyroidectomy + LND) were compared in both groups.

Results: A total of 1621 patients were enrolled. Compared to intermittent monitoring group, real-time monitoring group significantly shortened operation durations in the four surgical types (30.8±6.1 min vs. 35.7±5.7 min, 54.7±4.4 min vs. 59.1±5.2 min, 39.3±4.6 min vs. 42.0±4.7 min, 59.1±4.9 min vs. 66.0±5.8 min, respectively). As for surgical complications, compared to intermittent monitoring group, real-time monitoring group had lower rates of transient vocal cord paralysis among the four surgical types (0.0 vs. 3.3%, 0.0% vs. 4.0%, 0.8 vs. 3.2%, 2.8 vs. 6.7%, respectively), and lower rates of EBSLN injury (1.1 vs. 4.4%, 0.0 vs. 12.0%, 0.8 vs. 3.8%, 0.9 vs. 4.8%, respectively). Clinicopathologic characteristics and postoperative inflammatory reactions were similarly paralleled in both groups.

Conclusion: Implementation of real-time monitoring in endoscopic thyroidectomy effectively protects the RLN and EBSLN while shortening operation duration, demonstrating its feasibility and efficacy in enhancing nerve protection and surgical efficiency.

References
1.
Kuo T, Chen K, Lai C, Wang Y, Lin M, Chang C . Comparison of safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction with thermal ablation versus endoscopic thyroidectomy for benign thyroid nodules in a propensity-matched cohort. Int J Surg. 2024; 110(5):2568-2576. PMC: 11093446. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001201. View

2.
Zhang G, Zhang G, Lin Y, Li B, Gao J, Chen Y . Endoscopic thyroidectomy versus traditional open thyroidectomy for identification of the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve. Surg Endosc. 2020; 35(6):2831-2837. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07718-x. View

3.
Wong A, Ahsanuddin S, Teng M, Abdelhamid Ahmed A, Randolph G, Sinclair C . US residents experiences with intraoperative nerve monitoring in thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Head Neck. 2023; 45(8):2009-2016. DOI: 10.1002/hed.27427. View

4.
Xuan H, Anh T, Xuan H, Thai D, Le Van Q . Occult Central Lymph Node Metastasis in cN0 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Patients Undergoing TOETVA Procedure. J Thyroid Res. 2023; 2023:4779409. PMC: 10703521. DOI: 10.1155/2023/4779409. View

5.
Zhang D, Wang T, Kim H, Wang P, Dionigi G, Pino A . Strategies for superior thyroid pole dissection in transoral thyroidectomy: a video operative guide. Surg Endosc. 2020; 34(8):3711-3721. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07577-6. View