Reliability and Validity of the Martin Vigorimeter for Grip Strength Measurement in Korean Adults

Overview

Journal Clin Orthop Surg

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2024 Aug 2

PMID 39092298

Authors

Jeong Kil Lee

Meesun Jung

Han Byul Lee

Hyung Jin Chung

Seung Hoo Lee

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Grip strength is important for fine motor skills, and one of the measurement tools for grip strength is the Martin Vigorimeter (MV) dynamometer. Studies on establishing the reliability and validity of the MV in Koreans are limited. We aimed to establish the reliability and validity of the MV for grip strength measurement in healthy Korean adults by comparing it with the Jamar dynamometer, the standard tool used by the American Society of Hand Therapists.

Methods: In total, 99 healthy participants (50 men and 49 women) were enrolled. Grip strength was measured using the Jamar dynamometer and MV. Reliability and validity were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC). The correlation between the measurements of the instruments was analyzed using Pearson's correlation. The effect of hand anthropometry was evaluated, and the conversion equation between the instruments was calculated.

Results: MV showed excellent reliability (ICC > 0.90, < 0.001) and validity with a high correlation (0.7 ≤ < 0.9) with the Jamar dynamometer. The MDC was acceptable for detecting minimal clinically important differences (< 19.5%) in both instruments (Jamar: 3.4%-6.7%, MV: 3.8% to 6.3%). The grip strength measured using the MV was independent of hand anthropometry, unlike that using the Jamar dynamometer.

Conclusions: This study provides insights into the relationship between the Jamar and MV instruments for measuring grip strength in Koreans. The MV is a viable alternative to the Jamar dynamometer in Koreans, offering not only reproducible and reliable measurements of grip strength but also the advantage of being unaffected by variations in hand anthropometry.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of partial toe and iliac bone transfer for reconstruction of grade I-III fingers' defects.

Li G, Du H, Yan Y, Hou Y, Zhao G, Lei X BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):221.

PMID: 40045257 PMC: 11881405. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08434-0.

References

Solgaard S, Kristiansen B, Jensen J . Evaluation of instruments for measuring grip strength. Acta Orthop Scand. 1984; 55(5):569-72. DOI: 10.3109/17453678408992963. View

Sipers W, Verdijk L, Sipers S, Schols J, van Loon L . The Martin Vigorimeter Represents a Reliable and More Practical Tool Than the Jamar Dynamometer to Assess Handgrip Strength in the Geriatric Patient. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016; 17(5):466.e1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.02.026. View

Kim M, Won C, Kim M . Muscular grip strength normative values for a Korean population from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2014-2015. PLoS One. 2018; 13(8):e0201275. PMC: 6101358. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201275. View

Kim J, Park M, Shin S . What is the minimum clinically important difference in grip strength?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472(8):2536-41. PMC: 4079876. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3666-y. View

Robertson A, Deitz J . A description of grip strength in preschool children. Am J Occup Ther. 1988; 42(10):647-52. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.42.10.647. View

Trampisch U, Franke J, Jedamzik N, Hinrichs T, Platen P . Optimal Jamar dynamometer handle position to assess maximal isometric hand grip strength in epidemiological studies. J Hand Surg Am. 2012; 37(11):2368-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.08.014. View

Hopkins W . Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000; 30(1):1-15. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001. View

Roebroeck M, Harlaar J, Lankhorst G . The application of generalizability theory to reliability assessment: an illustration using isometric force measurements. Phys Ther. 1993; 73(6):386-95; discussion 396-401. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/73.6.386. View

Lee S, Gong H . Measurement and Interpretation of Handgrip Strength for Research on Sarcopenia and Osteoporosis. J Bone Metab. 2020; 27(2):85-96. PMC: 7297622. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2020.27.2.85. View

10.

Mukaka M . Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2013; 24(3):69-71. PMC: 3576830. View

11.

Koo T, Li M . A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-63. PMC: 4913118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. View

12.

Ruiz J, Espana-Romero V, Ortega F, Sjostrom M, Castillo M, Gutierrez A . Hand span influences optimal grip span in male and female teenagers. J Hand Surg Am. 2006; 31(8):1367-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.06.014. View

13.

Hogrel J . Grip strength measured by high precision dynamometry in healthy subjects from 5 to 80 years. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 16:139. PMC: 4460675. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0612-4. View

14.

Desrosiers J, Hebert R, Bravo G, Dutil E . Comparison of the Jamar dynamometer and the Martin vigorimeter for grip strength measurements in a healthy elderly population. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995; 27(3):137-43. View

15.

Ager C, Olivett B, Johnson C . Grasp and pinch strength in children 5 to 12 years old. Am J Occup Ther. 1984; 38(2):107-13. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.38.2.107. View

16.

Link L, Lukens S, Bush M . Spherical grip strength in children 3 to 6 years of age. Am J Occup Ther. 1995; 49(4):318-26. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.49.4.318. View

17.

Molenaar H, Zuidam J, Selles R, Stam H, Hovius S . Age-specific reliability of two grip-strength dynamometers when used by children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(5):1053-9. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00469. View

18.

Espana-Romero V, Artero E, Santaliestra-Pasias A, Gutierrez A, Castillo M, Ruiz J . Hand span influences optimal grip span in boys and girls aged 6 to 12 years. J Hand Surg Am. 2008; 33(3):378-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.11.013. View

19.

Neumann S, Kwisda S, Krettek C, Gaulke R . Comparison of the Grip Strength Using the Martin-Vigorimeter and the JAMAR-Dynamometer: Establishment of Normal Values. In Vivo. 2017; 31(5):917-924. PMC: 5656866. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11147. View