» Articles » PMID: 39091508

The Impact of Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on Cystic Fibrosis Health-related Quality of Life and Decision-making About Daily Treatment Regimens: a Mixed Methods Exploratory Study

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2024 Aug 2
PMID 39091508
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has reduced many symptoms of cystic fibrosis (CF).

Objectives: We sought to identify the impact of ETI on both symptoms and treatment decisions among adults with CF.

Design: Participants were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. Surveys were sent a RedCap link. Semistructured interviews were administered remotely Microsoft Teams. Interviews were audio recorded and professionally transcribed.

Methods: We assessed Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) subscales for physical, respiratory, emotion, and treatment, and analyzed semistructured interviews covering CF treatment regimens and daily living. Quantitative and qualitative results were analyzed separately and via a mixed-methods convergence coding matrix.

Results: Twenty-four adults with CF taking ETI were included. CFQ-R subscale scores (mean scores/standard deviation) were physical (82.1/22.8), respiratory (83.7/11.2), emotion (65.3/14.2), and treatment (57.5/20.1). Three themes about decision-making for non-ETI-treatments emerged: (1) How I'm feeling, (2) Not noticing a difference, and (3) Uncertainty about long-term impact of modifying treatment regimens, and we found participants weighed each of these factors in their treatment decisions. Key findings from mixed-methods analysis show that among individuals experiencing higher CFQ-R scores for physical and respiratory compared to emotion and treatment, there were statements indicating that while those participants were experiencing better physical health, many continued their burdensome treatment regimens.

Conclusion: With little long-term data on the impact of reducing non-ETI treatments, participants weighed how they were feeling, treatment efficacy beliefs, and risk tolerance when making treatment decisions.

References
1.
Bodemer N, Meder B, Gigerenzer G . Communicating Relative Risk Changes with Baseline Risk: Presentation Format and Numeracy Matter. Med Decis Making. 2014; 34(5):615-26. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X14526305. View

2.
Mayer-Hamblett N, Nichols D, Odem-Davis K, Riekert K, Sawicki G, Donaldson S . Evaluating the Impact of Stopping Chronic Therapies after Modulator Drug Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis: The SIMPLIFY Clinical Trial Study Design. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021; 18(8):1397-1405. PMC: 8513667. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202010-1336SD. View

3.
Aschenbrenner D . New Treatment for Cystic Fibrosis. Am J Nurs. 2020; 120(2):21. DOI: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000654296.83890.58. View

4.
Quittner A, Buu A, Messer M, Modi A, Watrous M . Development and validation of The Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire in the United States: a health-related quality-of-life measure for cystic fibrosis. Chest. 2005; 128(4):2347-54. DOI: 10.1378/chest.128.4.2347. View

5.
Hekler E, Lambert J, Leventhal E, Leventhal H, Jahn E, Contrada R . Commonsense illness beliefs, adherence behaviors, and hypertension control among African Americans. J Behav Med. 2008; 31(5):391-400. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-008-9165-4. View