Single-cell Magnetotaxis in Mucus-mimicking Polymeric Solutions

Overview

Journal Front Microbiol

Specialty Microbiology

Date 2024 Aug 2

PMID 39091301

Authors

Brianna Bradley

Carlos Escobedo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) are promising candidates for use as biomicrorobots in biomedical applications due to their motility, self-propulsion, and the ability to direct their navigation with an applied magnetic field. When in the body, the MTB may encounter non-Newtonian fluids such as blood plasma or mucus. However, their motility and the effectiveness of directed navigation in non-Newtonian fluids has yet to be studied on a single-cell level. In this work, we investigate motility of AMB-1 in three concentrations of polyacrylamide (PAM) solution, a mucus-mimicking fluid. The swimming speeds increase from 44.0 ± 13.6 μm/s in 0 mg/mL of PAM to 52.73 ± 15.6 μm/s in 1 mg/mL then decreases to 24.51 ± 11.7 μm/s in 2 mg/mL and 21.23 ± 10.5 μm/s in 3 mg/mL. This trend of a speed increase in low polymer concentrations followed by a decrease in speed as the concentration increases past a threshold concentration is consistent with other studies of motile, flagellated bacteria. Past this threshold concentration of PAM, there is a higher percentage of cells with an overall trajectory angle deviating from the angle of the magnetic field lines. There is also less linearity in the trajectories and an increase in reversals of swimming direction. Altogether, we show that MTB can be directed in polymer concentrations mimicking biological mucus, demonstrating the influence of the medium viscosity on the linearity of their trajectories which alters the effective path that could be predefined in Newtonian fluids when transport is achieved by magnetotaxis.

References

McDonald J, Duffy D, ANDERSON J, Chiu D, Wu H, Schueller O . Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Electrophoresis. 2000; 21(1):27-40. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(20000101)21:1<27::AID-ELPS27>3.0.CO;2-C. View

Patteson A, Gopinath A, Goulian M, Arratia P . Running and tumbling with E. coli in polymeric solutions. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:15761. PMC: 4938119. DOI: 10.1038/srep15761. View

Curt J, Pringle R . Viscosity of gastric mucus in duodenal ulceration. Gut. 1969; 10(11):931-4. PMC: 1553046. DOI: 10.1136/gut.10.11.931. View

Popp F, Armitage J, Schuler D . Polarity of bacterial magnetotaxis is controlled by aerotaxis through a common sensory pathway. Nat Commun. 2014; 5:5398. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6398. View

Brust M, Schaefer C, Doerr R, Pan L, Garcia M, Arratia P . Rheology of human blood plasma: viscoelastic versus Newtonian behavior. Phys Rev Lett. 2014; 110(7):078305. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.078305. View

Seong S, Park T . Swimming characteristics of magnetic bacterium, Magnetospirillum sp. AMB-1, and implications as toxicity measurement. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001; 76(1):11-6. DOI: 10.1002/bit.1021. View

Gandia D, Gandarias L, Rodrigo I, Robles-Garcia J, Das R, Garaio E . Unlocking the Potential of Magnetotactic Bacteria as Magnetic Hyperthermia Agents. Small. 2019; 15(41):e1902626. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201902626. View

Murat D, Herisse M, Espinosa L, Bossa A, Alberto F, Wu L . Opposite and Coordinated Rotation of Amphitrichous Flagella Governs Oriented Swimming and Reversals in a Magnetotactic Spirillum. J Bacteriol. 2015; 197(20):3275-82. PMC: 4573727. DOI: 10.1128/JB.00172-15. View

Martinez V, Schwarz-Linek J, Reufer M, Wilson L, Morozov A, Poon W . Flagellated bacterial motility in polymer solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(50):17771-6. PMC: 4273371. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1415460111. View

10.

Schneider W, DOETSCH R . Effect of viscosity on bacterial motility. J Bacteriol. 1974; 117(2):696-701. PMC: 285562. DOI: 10.1128/jb.117.2.696-701.1974. View

11.

Rismani Yazi S, Nosrati R, Stevens C, Vogel D, Escobedo C . Migration of magnetotactic bacteria in porous media. Biomicrofluidics. 2018; 12(1):011101. PMC: 5828923. DOI: 10.1063/1.5024508. View

12.

Mokrani N, Felfoul O, Afkhami Zarreh F, Mohammadi M, Aloyz R, Batist G . Magnetotactic bacteria penetration into multicellular tumor spheroids for targeted therapy. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010; 2010:4371-4. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627105. View

13.

Lefevre C, Bennet M, Landau L, Vach P, Pignol D, Bazylinski D . Diversity of magneto-aerotactic behaviors and oxygen sensing mechanisms in cultured magnetotactic bacteria. Biophys J. 2014; 107(2):527-538. PMC: 4104051. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.05.043. View

14.

Bazylinski D, Frankel R . Magnetosome formation in prokaryotes. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004; 2(3):217-30. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro842. View

15.

Tung C, Lin C, Harvey B, Fiore A, Ardon F, Wu M . Fluid viscoelasticity promotes collective swimming of sperm. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):3152. PMC: 5466690. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03341-4. View

16.

Lai S, Wang Y, Wirtz D, Hanes J . Micro- and macrorheology of mucus. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009; 61(2):86-100. PMC: 2736374. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.09.012. View

17.

Berg H, Turner L . Movement of microorganisms in viscous environments. Nature. 1979; 278(5702):349-51. DOI: 10.1038/278349a0. View

18.

Bradley B, Gomez-Cruz J, Escobedo C . Integrated Microfluidic-Electromagnetic System to Probe Single-Cell Magnetotaxis in Microconfinement. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(9). PMC: 10525280. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10091034. View

19.

Hyakutake T, Mori K, Sato K . Effects of surrounding fluid on motility of hyperactivated bovine sperm. J Biomech. 2018; 71:183-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.02.009. View

20.

Varchanis S, Dimakopoulos Y, Wagner C, Tsamopoulos J . How viscoelastic is human blood plasma?. Soft Matter. 2018; 14(21):4238-4251. DOI: 10.1039/C8SM00061A. View