» Articles » PMID: 39088310

A Point-of-care Tenofovir Urine Test Improves Accuracy of Self-reported Preexposure Prophylaxis Adherence and Increases Condomless Sex Reporting Among Young Women

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated a recently developed and validated point-of-care urine tenofovir (POC TFV) test to determine whether its use improves the accuracy of self-reported adherence to preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and sexual behavior.

Design: We enrolled sexually active HIV-negative women ages 16 to 25 years in Kampala, Uganda.

Methods: Women were followed quarterly for 24 months with HIV prevention counseling, PrEP dispensation, and adherence counseling. Midway through the study, the POC TFV test was introduced as part of routine study procedures. We examined changes in self-reported PrEP adherence, sexual behavior, and accuracy of self-reported PrEP adherence before and after the introduction of the POC TFV test.

Results: A total of 146 women receiving PrEP refills had at least one visit with a POC TFV test administered before the study exit. At baseline, the median age was 19 years [interquartile range (IQR): 18-21] and the majority (76%) reported having condomless sex within the last 3 months. Participants more frequently self-reported low PrEP adherence [odds ratio (OR): 2.96, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.89-4.67, P  = 0.001] and condomless sex (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.04-2.06, P  = 0.03) during visits using the test compared with visits without the test. The accuracy of self-reported PrEP adherence (determined by concordance with TFV-diphosphate levels) was greater when the test was used (61 versus 24%, OR: 4.86, 95% CI: 2.85-8.30, P  < 0.001).

Conclusion: When the POC TFV test was used, we observed greater reporting of condomless sex, low PrEP adherence, and more accurate reports of PrEP adherence. The test could facilitate honest conversations between clients and providers and warrant further investigation.

References
1.
Castillo-Mancilla J, Haberer J . Adherence Measurements in HIV: New Advancements in Pharmacologic Methods and Real-Time Monitoring. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2018; 15(1):49-59. PMC: 5876155. DOI: 10.1007/s11904-018-0377-0. View

2.
Marrazzo J, Ramjee G, Richardson B, Gomez K, Mgodi N, Nair G . Tenofovir-based preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(6):509-18. PMC: 4341965. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402269. View

3.
Celum C, Bukusi E, Bekker L, Delany-Moretlwe S, Kidoguchi L, Omollo V . PrEP use and HIV seroconversion rates in adolescent girls and young women from Kenya and South Africa: the POWER demonstration project. J Int AIDS Soc. 2022; 25(7):e25962. PMC: 9278271. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25962. View

4.
Kinuthia J, Pintye J, Abuna F, Mugwanya K, Lagat H, Onyango D . Pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake and early continuation among pregnant and post-partum women within maternal and child health clinics in Kenya: results from an implementation programme. Lancet HIV. 2019; 7(1):e38-e48. PMC: 11498332. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30335-2. View

5.
Mayer K, Molina J, Thompson M, Anderson P, Mounzer K, De Wet J . Emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (DISCOVER): primary results from a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, active-controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2020; 396(10246):239-254. PMC: 9665936. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31065-5. View