» Articles » PMID: 39088077

Clinical Characteristics, Prognosis Factors and Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Diagnosis of Mucormycosis in Patients With Hematologic Diseases

Overview
Journal Mycopathologia
Date 2024 Aug 1
PMID 39088077
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: New diagnostic methods and antifungal strategies may improve prognosis of mucormycosis. We describe the diagnostic value of metagenomic next⁃generation sequencing (mNGS) and identify the prognostic factors of mucormycosis.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of hematologic patients suffered from mucormycosis and treated with monotherapy [amphotericin B (AmB) or posaconazole] or combination therapy (AmB and posaconazole). The primary outcome was 84-day all-cause mortality after diagnosis.

Results: Ninety-five patients were included, with "proven" (n = 27), "probable" (n = 16) mucormycosis confirmed by traditional diagnostic methods, and "possible" (n = 52) mucormycosis with positive mNGS results. The mortality rate at 84 days was 44.2%. Possible + mNGS patients and probable patients had similar diagnosis processes, overall survival rates (44.2% vs 50.0%, p = 0.685) and overall response rates to effective drugs (44.0% vs 37.5%, p = 0.647). Furthermore, the median diagnostic time was shorter in possible + mNGS patients than proven and probable patients (14 vs 26 days, p < 0.001). Combination therapy was associated with better survival compared to monotherapy at six weeks after treatment (78.8% vs 53.1%, p = 0.0075). Multivariate analysis showed that combination therapy was the protective factor (HR = 0.338, 95% CI: 0.162-0.703, p = 0.004), though diabetes (HR = 3.864, 95% CI: 1.897-7.874, p < 0.001) and hypoxemia (HR = 3.536, 95% CI: 1.874-6.673, p < 0.001) were risk factors for mortality.

Conclusions: Mucormycosis is a life-threatening infection. Early management of diabetes and hypoxemia may improve the prognosis. Exploring effective diagnostic and treatment methods is important, and combination antifungal therapy seems to hold potential benefits.

References
1.
Kontoyiannis D, Marr K, Park B, Alexander B, Anaissie E, Walsh T . Prospective surveillance for invasive fungal infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, 2001-2006: overview of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET) Database. Clin Infect Dis. 2010; 50(8):1091-100. DOI: 10.1086/651263. View

2.
Jeong W, Keighley C, Wolfe R, Lee W, Slavin M, Kong D . The epidemiology and clinical manifestations of mucormycosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case reports. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018; 25(1):26-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.07.011. View

3.
Choksi T, Agrawal A, Date P, Rathod D, Gharat A, Ingole A . Cumulative Mortality and Factors Associated With Outcomes of Mucormycosis After COVID-19 at a Multispecialty Tertiary Care Center in India. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021; 140(1):66-72. PMC: 8662533. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.5201. View

4.
Katragkou A, Walsh T, Roilides E . Why is mucormycosis more difficult to cure than more common mycoses?. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013; 20 Suppl 6:74-81. DOI: 10.1111/1469-0691.12466. View

5.
Gu W, Miller S, Chiu C . Clinical Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pathogen Detection. Annu Rev Pathol. 2018; 14:319-338. PMC: 6345613. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-012751. View