Comparative Analysis of the Degree of Patient Satisfaction After Breast-conserving Surgery with or Without Oncoplastic Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview

Journal Front Surg

Specialty General Surgery

Date 2024 Aug 1

PMID 39086922

Authors

Fabiana Christina Araujo Pereira Lisboa

Lucimara Priscila Campos Veras Giorgi

Ana Claudia Morais Godoy Figueiredo

Regis Resende Paulinelli

Joao Batista de Sousa

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Conservative surgery is the gold standard for the treatment of single and small tumors and, combined with the concept of oncoplastic tumors, brings good aesthetic results while maintaining cancer safety. The objective was to comparatively analyze the degree of satisfaction of patients undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS), with and without oncoplastic surgery (OPS) using level II OPS techniques.

Methods: Review with a search in the databases MEDLINE (by PubMed), EMBASE, Clinical Trials, Scopus, Web of Science, BVS and Oppen gray. The meta-analysis of random effects was performed using the Der Simonian-Laird method considering the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the aesthetic outcome between women who underwent OPS and BCS (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.62-1.30). The staging (OR 1.93; 95% CI 0.97-3.84; = 15.83%); tumor location [central (OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.06-27.49; = 17.63%); lower (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.21-2.65; = 2.21%); superior (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.26-1.74; = 0.00%] and tumor size (OR 8.73; 95% CI -11.82-29.28; = 93.18%) showed no association with the type of BCS performed, with or without OPS. The degree of satisfaction remains even in cases of extreme oncoplasty.

Conclusion: The level of patient satisfaction in relation to BCS was similar to that of the group undergoing OPS, highlighting that OPS allows the patient's satisfaction rate to be maintained even in the case of large or multicentric tumors.

References

Clough K, Kaufman G, Nos C, Buccimazza I, Sarfati I . Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17(5):1375-91. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0792-y. View

Han J, Grothuesmann D, Neises M, Hille U, Hillemanns P . Quality of life and satisfaction after breast cancer operation. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009; 282(1):75-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-009-1302-y. View

Clough K, Benyahi D, Nos C, Charles C, Sarfati I . Oncoplastic surgery: pushing the limits of breast-conserving surgery. Breast J. 2015; 21(2):140-6. DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12372. View

Losken A, Styblo T, Carlson G, Jones G, Amerson B . Management algorithm and outcome evaluation of partial mastectomy defects treated using reduction or mastopexy techniques. Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 59(3):235-42. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31802ec6d1. View

Ojala K, Meretoja T, Leidenius M . Aesthetic and functional outcome after breast conserving surgery - Comparison between conventional and oncoplastic resection. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017; 43(4):658-664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.11.019. View

Losken A, Dugal C, Styblo T, Carlson G . A meta-analysis comparing breast conservation therapy alone to the oncoplastic technique. Ann Plast Surg. 2013; 72(2):145-9. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182605598. View

Massa M, Meszaros P, Baldelli I, Bisso N, Franchelli S . Aesthetic evaluation in oncoplastic and conservative breast surgery: a comparative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015; 3(3):e339. PMC: 4448714. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000309. View

Stroup D, Berlin J, Morton S, Olkin I, Williamson G, Rennie D . Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000; 283(15):2008-12. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008. View

Cardoso M, Cardoso J, Vrieling C, Macmillan D, Rainsbury D, Heil J . Recommendations for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 135(3):629-37. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-1978-8. View

10.

Losken A, Hart A, Chatterjee A . Updated Evidence on the Oncoplastic Approach to Breast Conservation Therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140:14S-22S. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003951. View

11.

Acea-Nebril B, Cereijo-Garea C, Garcia-Novoa A, Varela-Lamas C, Builes-Ramirez S, Bouzon-Alejandro A . The role of oncoplastic breast reduction in the conservative management of breast cancer: Complications, survival, and quality of life. J Surg Oncol. 2017; 115(6):679-686. DOI: 10.1002/jso.24550. View

12.

Holmes D, Schooler W, Smith R . Oncoplastic approaches to breast conservation. Int J Breast Cancer. 2012; 2011:303879. PMC: 3262568. DOI: 10.4061/2011/303879. View

13.

DerSimonian R, Laird N . Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015; 45(Pt A):139-45. PMC: 4639420. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.002. View

14.

Kosasih S, Tayeh S, Mokbel K, Kasem A . Is oncoplastic breast conserving surgery oncologically safe? A meta-analysis of 18,103 patients. Am J Surg. 2020; 220(2):385-392. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.12.019. View

15.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

16.

Mascaro A, Farina M, Gigli R, Vitelli C, Fortunato L . Recent advances in the surgical care of breast cancer patients. World J Surg Oncol. 2010; 8:5. PMC: 2828445. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-8-5. View

17.

de Oliveira-Junior I, da Silva I, da Silva F, da Silva J, Sarri A, Paiva C . Oncoplastic Surgery in Breast-Conserving Treatment: Patient Profile and Impact on Quality of Life. Breast Care (Basel). 2021; 16(3):243-253. PMC: 8248771. DOI: 10.1159/000507240. View

18.

Canturk N, Simsek T, Gurdal S . Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery According to Tumor Location. Eur J Breast Health. 2021; 17(3):220-233. PMC: 8246052. DOI: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-1-2. View

19.

Spear S, Pelletiere C, Menon N . One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2004; 28(5):259-67. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-004-0032-6. View

20.

McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel D, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C . PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 75:40-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. View