» Articles » PMID: 39086709

Comparative Evaluation of Supplementary Cleaning Techniques for Removal of Bio-C Sealer and AH-Plus from Oval Root Canals: A Micro-CT Analysis

Overview
Journal Iran Endod J
Date 2024 Aug 1
PMID 39086709
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two endodontic cleaning techniques, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and the XP-endo Finisher R (XPR) system, in removing residual filling material during endodontic retreatment procedures.

Materials And Methods: Forty mandibular premolars with oval canals were divided into four groups based on the sealer used (AH-Plus or Bio-C Sealer) and the cleaning technique employed (PUI or XPR). To ensure uniformity of canal volume among groups, initial micro-CT scans were conducted. The canals were instrumented, filled, and then re-instrumented before undergoing either PUI or XPR cleaning techniques. Residual filling material volumes were assessed through micro-CT scans, and statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results: Following instrumentation, there was no significant difference in residual filling material volumes between AH-Plus and Bio-C Sealer groups (1.35 mmand 1.02 mm, respectively; >0.05). However, after supplementary cleaning techniques, XPR-cleaned specimens exhibited significantly less residual material compared to PUI-cleaned specimens (0.01 mm and 0.29 mm for Bio-C Sealer, and 0.07 mm and. 0.30 mm for AH-Plus, <0.05).

Conclusion: The XPR system was found to be more effective than PUI in removing residual filling material from Bio-C Sealer-filled root canals. This highlights its potential as a useful supplementary cleaning technique in endodontic retreatment procedures.

References
1.
Lee B, Hong J, Kim S, Jang J, Chang H, Hwang Y . Anti-inflammatory and Osteogenic Effects of Calcium Silicate-based Root Canal Sealers. J Endod. 2018; 45(1):73-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.09.006. View

2.
Schneider S . A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971; 32(2):271-5. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1. View

3.
Almeida A, Romeiro K, Cassimiro M, Gominho L, Dantas E, Silva S . Micro-CT analysis of dentinal microcracks on root canals filled with a bioceramic sealer and retreated with reciprocating instruments. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):15264. PMC: 7498450. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71989-6. View

4.
Campos Fruchi L, Ordinola-Zapata R, Cavenago B, Duarte M, Bueno C, Martin A . Efficacy of reciprocating instruments for removing filling material in curved canals obturated with a single-cone technique: a micro-computed tomographic analysis. J Endod. 2014; 40(7):1000-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.011. View

5.
Oltra E, Cox T, LaCourse M, Johnson J, Paranjpe A . Retreatability of two endodontic sealers, EndoSequence BC Sealer and AH Plus: a micro-computed tomographic comparison. Restor Dent Endod. 2017; 42(1):19-26. PMC: 5299751. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.1.19. View