The Option of Transosseous Distal Suture Placement During Minimally Invasive Achilles Tendon Repair for High-risk Patients Can Improve Outcomes, However Does Not Prevent Re-rupture

Overview

Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology

Date 2024 Jul 31

PMID 39085820

Authors

Michael R Carmont

Katarina Nilsson-Helander

Malin Carling

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Achilles tendon ruptures (ATRs) close to the insertion, in high-level athletes, and in patients at high risk of re-rupture, may be better suited to operative repair. Minimally Invasive Repair (MIR) of the Achilles tendon has excellent outcome and low complication rates. Traditionally MIR has showed lower repair strength, failing due to suture pull-out from the distal tendon stump. The aim of this study was to describe the outcome of ATR patients who received transosseous distal suture placement using a standard technique as a reference.

Methods: Following ATR, patients were evaluated for pre-injury activity level, body weight, location of the tear and size of the distal Achilles tendon stump. Patients considered to be at high-risk of re-rupture: Tegner level ≥ 8, body weight ≥ 105Kg and distal ATR, received transosseous (TO) distal suture placement (n = 20) rather than the usual transtendinous (TT) technique (n = 55). Patient reported outcome measures and functional evaluation was performed at 12 months following repair.

Results: At 12 months follow up both methods resulted in good median (IQR) Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score TO 83.8 (74-88.3) vs. TT 90 (79-94), low increased relative Achilles Tendon Resting Angle TO -3.5˚ (3.6) vs. TT -3.5˚ (3.3) and mean (SD) Single leg Heel-Rise Height Index TO 88.2% (9.9) vs. TT 85.6% (9.9) (n.s.). There were 4 re-ruptures in the high-risk group and 2 in the group receiving TT distal suture placement. All but one of these were traumatic in nature. The mode of failure following TO distal suture placement was proximal suture pull out.

Conclusions: To distal suture placement during minimally-invasive Achilles tendon repair for higher-risk patients can lead to results equivalent to those in lower-risk patients treated with a standard TT MIR technique, except for the re-rupture rate which remained higher. There may be factors that have greater influence on outcome other than suture placement following ATR.

References

McWilliam J, Mackay G . The Internal Brace for Midsubstance Achilles Ruptures. Foot Ankle Int. 2016; 37(7):794-800. DOI: 10.1177/1071100716653373. View

Nilsson-Helander K, Thomee R, Silbernagel K, Gravare-Silbernagel K, Thomee P, Faxen E . The Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS): development and validation. Am J Sports Med. 2006; 35(3):421-6. DOI: 10.1177/0363546506294856. View

Heikkinen J, Lantto I, Flinkkila T, Ohtonen P, Niinimaki J, Siira P . Soleus Atrophy Is Common After the Nonsurgical Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Surgical and Nonsurgical Functional Treatments. Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45(6):1395-1404. DOI: 10.1177/0363546517694610. View

Maffulli N, Gougoulias N, Maffulli G, Oliva F, Migliorini F . Slowed-Down Rehabilitation Following Percutaneous Repair of Achilles Tendon Rupture. Foot Ankle Int. 2021; 43(2):244-252. PMC: 8841642. DOI: 10.1177/10711007211038594. View

Lantto I, Heikkinen J, Flinkkila T, Ohtonen P, Siira P, Laine V . A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatments of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures. Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44(9):2406-14. DOI: 10.1177/0363546516651060. View

Liechti D, Moatshe G, Backus J, Marchetti D, Clanton T . A Percutaneous Knotless Technique for Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures. Arthrosc Tech. 2018; 7(2):e171-e178. PMC: 5851437. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.08.065. View

Olsson N, Silbernagel K, Eriksson B, Sansone M, Brorsson A, Nilsson-Helander K . Stable surgical repair with accelerated rehabilitation versus nonsurgical treatment for acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a randomized controlled study. Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41(12):2867-76. DOI: 10.1177/0363546513503282. View

Carmont M, Kuiper J, Silbernagel K, Karlsson J, Nilsson-Helander K . Tendon end separation with loading in an Achilles tendon repair model: comparison of non-absorbable vs. absorbable sutures. J Exp Orthop. 2017; 4(1):26. PMC: 5520830. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-017-0101-9. View

Jennings A, Sefton G, Newman R . Repair of acute rupture of the Achilles tendon: a new technique using polyester tape without external splintage. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2004; 86(6):445-8. PMC: 1964280. DOI: 10.1308/147870804957. View

10.

Svedman S, Juthberg R, Edman G, Ackermann P . Reduced Time to Surgery Improves Patient-Reported Outcome After Achilles Tendon Rupture. Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46(12):2929-2934. DOI: 10.1177/0363546518793655. View

11.

Maffulli N . The clinical diagnosis of subcutaneous tear of the Achilles tendon. A prospective study in 174 patients. Am J Sports Med. 1998; 26(2):266-70. DOI: 10.1177/03635465980260021801. View

12.

Grassi A, Amendola A, Samuelsson K, Svantesson E, Romagnoli M, Bondi A . Minimally Invasive Versus Open Repair for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: Meta-Analysis Showing Reduced Complications, with Similar Outcomes, After Minimally Invasive Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018; 100(22):1969-1981. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01364. View

13.

Longo U, Forriol F, Campi S, Maffulli N, Denaro V . A biomechanical comparison of the primary stability of two minimally invasive techniques for repair of ruptured Achilles tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20(7):1392-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1868-3. View

14.

Lansdaal J, Goslings J, Reichart M, Govaert G, van Scherpenzeel K, Haverlag R . The results of 163 Achilles tendon ruptures treated by a minimally invasive surgical technique and functional aftertreatment. Injury. 2007; 38(7):839-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.12.010. View

15.

Van Nguyen L, Nguyen G, Nguyen B . The modified mini-open technique for repairing total ruptured Achilles tendon using fiber wire with calcaneal fixation. A prospective case series. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022; 75:103395. PMC: 8886017. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103395. View

16.

Attia A, Mahmoud K, DHooghe P, Bariteau J, Labib S, Myerson M . Outcomes and Complications of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Sports Med. 2021; 51(3):825-836. DOI: 10.1177/03635465211053619. View

17.

Hansen M, Barfod K, Kristensen M . Development and reliability of the Achilles Tendon Length Measure and comparison with the Achilles Tendon Resting Angle on patients with an Achilles tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017; 23(4):275-280. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.08.002. View

18.

Yammine K, Assi C . Efficacy of repair techniques of the Achilles tendon: A meta-analysis of human cadaveric biomechanical studies. Foot (Edinb). 2017; 30:13-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2016.09.006. View

19.

Maempel J, White T, Mackenzie S, McCann C, Clement N . The epidemiology of Achilles tendon re-rupture and associated risk factors: male gender, younger age and traditional immobilising rehabilitation are risk factors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30(7):2457-2469. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06824-0. View

20.

Metz R, Verleisdonk E, van der Heijden G, Clevers G, Hammacher E, Verhofstad M . Acute Achilles tendon rupture: minimally invasive surgery versus nonoperative treatment with immediate full weightbearing--a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36(9):1688-94. DOI: 10.1177/0363546508319312. View