» Articles » PMID: 39077705

Current Status and Future Direction of Antithrombotic Therapy for Patients with STEMI Undergoing Primary PCI

Overview
Date 2024 Jul 30
PMID 39077705
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Since the introduction of the first pharmacological therapy for the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction in the early 20th century, treatment of myocardial infarction has evolved extensively throughout the years. Mechanical revascularization therapies such as the percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, combined with the ongoing development of pharmacological therapies have successfully improved the survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction. To date, antiplatelet therapy (consisting of aspirin and an oral inhibitor) and anticoagulation therapy represent the main stay of pharmacological treatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The routine use of clopidogrel as antiplatelet agent has been largely replaced by the use of the more potent inhibitors ticagrelor and prasugrel. Unfractionated heparin remains the preferred anticoagulant therapy, despite the development of other anticoagulants, including enoxaparin and bivalirudin. To date, limited evidence exists supporting a pre-hospital initiation of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in STEMI patients. The use of potent intravenous antiplatelet agents, including the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and the intravenous inhibitor cangrelor, is currently restricted to specific clinical settings. While several potent antithrombotic agents already exist, the search for novel potent antithrombotic agents continues, with a focus on balancing antithrombotic properties with an improved safety profile to reduce excess bleeding. This review provides an overview of currently available pharmacological therapies for the treatment of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, and an outlook for the ongoing development of novel agents in this field.

Citing Articles

Prehospital crushed versus integral prasugrel loading dose in STEMI patients with a large myocardial area.

Wilschut J, Vogel R, Elscot J, Delewi R, Lemmert M, Van Der Waarden N EuroIntervention. 2024; 20(7):e436-e444.

PMID: 38562070 PMC: 10979386. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00618.

References
1.
Storey R, Gurbel P, Berg J, Bernaud C, Dangas G, Frenoux J . Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of single-dose subcutaneous administration of selatogrel, a novel P2Y12 receptor antagonist, in patients with chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41(33):3132-3140. PMC: 7556746. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz807. View

2.
Vogel R, Delewi R, Angiolillo D, Wilschut J, Lemmert M, Diletti R . Pharmacodynamic Effects of Pre-Hospital Administered Crushed Prasugrel in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 14(12):1323-1333. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.04.022. View

3.
Peerlinck K, De Lepeleire I, Goldberg M, Farrell D, Barrett J, Hand E . MK-383 (L-700,462), a selective nonpeptide platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist, is active in man. Circulation. 1993; 88(4 Pt 1):1512-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.88.4.1512. View

4.
Angiolillo D, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Bernardo E, Alfonso F, Macaya C, Bass T . Variability in individual responsiveness to clopidogrel: clinical implications, management, and future perspectives. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49(14):1505-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.11.044. View

5.
Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta S, Chrolavicius S, Tognoni G, Fox K . Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345(7):494-502. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa010746. View