» Articles » PMID: 39077223

Evaluation of the Bone Union Occurring Subsequent to C1-2 Fusion Combined With C1 Laminectomy for the Surgical Treatment of Retro-Odontoid Pseudotumor

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2024 Jul 30
PMID 39077223
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction Surgical treatments for retro-odontoid pseudotumors (ROPs) include C1 laminectomies and C1-2 and occipitocervical (OC) fusions. When a C1 laminectomy is combined with a C1-2 fusion, concerns arise regarding an increased risk of pseudarthrosis due to decreased bone grafting space. Extension of the fusion area to the OC region may be considered to ensure an adequate bone graft bed. However, this procedure is associated with a risk of complications. Thus, in this study, we investigated the bone fusion and clinical outcomes of C1-2 fusion combined with a C1 laminectomy. Methods Between January 2017 and December 2022, seven patients with ROPs who had undergone C1-2 fusion combined with a C1 laminectomy were included in the study. All patients were followed up for >1 year. Bone fusion was evaluated by computed tomography (CT) at one year postoperatively, while implant failure was assessed by radiography at the final follow-up. Clinical evaluations included preoperative and one-year postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and recovery rates. Results This study included five male and two female patients, with an average age of 71.9 years. The average follow-up duration was 3.3 years. The primary anchor choices included the C1 lateral mass screw and the C2 pedicle screw. In one case, the transarticular screw was utilized unilaterally, and in another case, a lamina screw was utilized unilaterally. One year postoperatively, CT revealed bone fusion in three of the seven patients. Fusion occurred at the lateral and median atlantoaxial joints in two cases and one case, respectively. Screw loosening was observed in one case. None of the patients required reoperations. The average JOA recovery rate was 34.6%. Conclusion This surgical technique is useful for stabilizing and decompressing the C1-2 region while preserving mobility at the OC joint. However, further long-term follow-up studies are required.

References
1.
Izeki M, Neo M, Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Ito H, Nagai K . The O-C2 angle established at occipito-cervical fusion dictates the patient's destiny in terms of postoperative dyspnea and/or dysphagia. Eur Spine J. 2013; 23(2):328-36. PMC: 3906459. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2963-6. View

2.
Yonezawa I, Okuda T, Won J, Sakoda J, Nakahara D, Nojiri H . Retrodental mass in rheumatoid arthritis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012; 26(2):E65-9. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182621a05. View

3.
Zygmunt S, Saveland H, Brattstrom H, Ljunggren B, Larsson E, Wollheim F . Reduction of rheumatoid periodontoid pannus following posterior occipito-cervical fusion visualised by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Neurosurg. 1988; 2(3):315-20. DOI: 10.3109/02688698809001001. View

4.
Barbagallo G, Certo F, Visocchi M, Palmucci S, Sciacca G, Albanese V . Disappearance of degenerative, non-inflammatory, retro-odontoid pseudotumor following posterior C1-C2 fixation: case series and review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22 Suppl 6:S879-88. PMC: 3830051. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-3004-1. View

5.
Sono T, Onishi E, Matsushita M . Radiographic risk factors and surgical outcomes for retroodontoid pseudotumors. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013; 27(6):E193-8. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318299f4d8. View