» Articles » PMID: 39076585

Superior Cuproptotic Efficacy of Diethyldithiocarbamate-CuO Nanoparticles over Diethyldithiocarbamate-CuO Nanoparticles in Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Overview
Journal Front Pharmacol
Date 2024 Jul 30
PMID 39076585
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HC) is a serious health concern. The stemness of cancer stem cells (CSCs) is a key driver for HC tumorigenesis, apoptotic resistance, and metastasis, and functional mitochondria are critical for its maintenance. Cuproptosis is Cu-dependent non-apoptotic pathway (mitochondrial dysfunction) via inactivating mitochondrial enzymes (pyruvate dehydrogenase "PDH" and succinate dehydrogenase "SDH"). To effectively treat metastatic HC, it is necessary to induce selective cuproptosis (for halting cancer stemness genes) with selective oxidative imbalance (for increasing cell susceptibility to cuproptosis and inducing non-CSCs death). Herein, two types of Cu oxide nanoparticles (CuO "C(I + II)" NPs and CuO "C(I)" NPs) were used in combination with diethyldithiocarbamate (DD, an aldehyde dehydrogenase "ALDH" inhibitor) for comparative anti-HC investigation. DC(I + II) NPs exhibited higher cytotoxicity, mitochondrial membrane potential, and anti-migration impact than DC(I) NPs in the treated human HC cells (HepG2 and/or Huh7). Moreover, DC(I + II) NPs were more effective than DC(I) NPs in the treatment of HC mouse groups. This was mediated via higher selective accumulation of DC(I + II) NPs in only tumor tissues and oxidant activity, causing stronger selective inhibition of mitochondrial enzymes (PDH, SDH, and ALDH2) than DC(I)NPs. This effect resulted in more suppression of tumor and metastasis markers as well as stemness gene expressions in DC(I + II) NPs-treated HC mice. In addition, both nanocomplexes normalized liver function and hematological parameters. The computational analysis found that DC(I + II) showed higher binding affinity to most of the tested enzymes. Accordingly, DC(I + II) NPs represent a highly effective therapeutic formulation compared to DC(I) NPs for metastatic HC.

Citing Articles

Advances in non-apoptotic regulated cell death: implications for malignant tumor treatment.

Zhang Y, Yi S, Luan M Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1519119.

PMID: 39949740 PMC: 11821507. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1519119.


Ferroptosis- and stemness inhibition-mediated therapeutic potency of ferrous oxide nanoparticles-diethyldithiocarbamate using a co-spheroid 3D model of pancreatic cancer.

Abu-Serie M, Gutierrez-Garcia A, Enman M, Vaish U, Fatima H, Dudeja V J Gastroenterol. 2025; .

PMID: 39888413 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-025-02213-3.

References
1.
Niitsu Y, Sato Y, Takayama T . Implications of glutathione-S transferase P1 in MAPK signaling as a CRAF chaperone: In memory of Dr. Irving Listowsky. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2022; 98(2):72-86. PMC: 8890996. DOI: 10.2183/pjab.98.005. View

2.
Cui J, Li G, Yin J, Li L, Tan Y, Wei H . GSTP1 and cancer: Expression, methylation, polymorphisms and signaling (Review). Int J Oncol. 2020; 56(4):867-878. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2020.4979. View

3.
Muramatsu M, Sakai M . Mechanisms of a tumor marker, glutathione transferase P, expression during hepatocarcinogenesis of the rat. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2015; 82(9):339-52. PMC: 4338839. DOI: 10.2183/pjab.82.339. View

4.
Margalef P, Kotsantis P, Borel V, Bellelli R, Panier S, Boulton S . Stabilization of Reversed Replication Forks by Telomerase Drives Telomere Catastrophe. Cell. 2018; 172(3):439-453.e14. PMC: 5786504. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.047. View

5.
Yan Y, Zhang D, Zhou P, Li B, Huang S . HDOCK: a web server for protein-protein and protein-DNA/RNA docking based on a hybrid strategy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45(W1):W365-W373. PMC: 5793843. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx407. View