» Articles » PMID: 39073553

Correlation of Left Atrial Strain with Invasively Measured Left Ventricular End-diastolic Pressure; Determining LA Strain Cut-off Value

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Jul 29
PMID 39073553
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Left atrium longitudinal strain (LAS) with speckle tracking method has been proposed as a non-invasive method for the assessment of left ventricular filling pressure and diastolic dysfunction. This study aimed to investigate left atrial strain compared to invasively measured left ventricular filling pressure. All Patients candidates for coronary angiography were consecutively recruited. LAS measured by transthoracic echocardiography. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) pressure was invasively measured. Current echocardiographic modalities for diastolic function evaluated. A total of 125 people were included. 45 patients had preserved ejection fraction (EF ≥ 50%) and 85 patients had reduced EF (EF < 50%) and compared two groups. LVEDP was significantly higher in reduced EF compared to preserved EF (p-value < 0.001). LA-reservoir and LA-booster strains were significantly lower in patients with reduced EF compared to preserved EF (p-value = 0.008, mean Reservoir = 16.4% ± 6.4, mean Reservoir = 19.5% ± 5.6, respectively) and (p-value = 0.009, mean Booster = 9.09% ± 4.0, mean Booster =11. 9% ± 4.3, respectively). LA 4ch-reservoir strain <14.4%, and LA 2ch-reservoir strain <14.1% were related to LVEDP≥20 mmHg (sensitivity 63.5% and specificity 75%) (sensitivity 77.9% and specificity of 60%) respectively. LAS is significantly lower in patients with elevated LVEDP (≥ 20mmHg). LAS is significantly lower in patients with reduced EF. Both LA-reservoir and LA-booster strains have a significant relation to predicting LVFP but LA-reservoir strain is more accurate. The mean LA-reservoir strain less than 12.4% is associated with LVEDP ≥ 20mmHg.

References
1.
Nagueh S, Appleton C, Gillebert T, Marino P, Oh J, Smiseth O . Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009; 10(2):165-93. DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jep007. View

2.
Balaney B, Medvedofsky D, Mediratta A, Singh A, Ciszek B, Kruse E . Invasive Validation of the Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures Using the 2016 Diastolic Guidelines: Head-to-Head Comparison with the 2009 Guidelines. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017; 31(1):79-88. PMC: 5756671. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.09.002. View

3.
Lancellotti P, Galderisi M, Edvardsen T, Donal E, Goliasch G, Cardim N . Echo-Doppler estimation of left ventricular filling pressure: results of the multicentre EACVI Euro-Filling study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 18(9):961-968. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jex067. View

4.
Hummel Y, Liu L, Lam C, Fonseca-Munoz D, Damman K, Rienstra M . Echocardiographic estimation of left ventricular and pulmonary pressures in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: a study utilizing simultaneous echocardiography and invasive measurements. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017; 19(12):1651-1660. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.957. View

5.
Ye Z, Miranda W, Yeung D, Kane G, Oh J . Left Atrial Strain in Evaluation of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020; 33(12):1490-1499. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2020.07.020. View