» Articles » PMID: 39072190

Measuring Active Ageing: A Scoping Review and the Applicability to the Situation in China

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2024 Jul 29
PMID 39072190
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Ageing has become one of the major global public issues and active ageing has become a global goal. Accurate and reproducible assessment tools are a prerequisite for robust and reliable measurement of active ageing and policy formulation. However, a broad scoping review describing the characteristics and heterogeneity of assessment tools for active ageing is lacking. This study aims to comprehensively portray current active ageing assessment tools and their features.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review, focusing on the Active Ageing Assessment Tool, and searched seven databases: CNKI, WanFang, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Medline, and Proquest. The research process adhered to the methodological framework of Arkey and O'Malley and the PRISMA-ScR specification. More so, we registered the research program with the Open Science Framework.

Results: Ultimately, we included twenty-two pieces of literature. The development of the active ageing assessment tool predominantly occurred between 2012 and 2023, with a focus on foreign countries (16 studies). All included literature presented multidimensional Active ageing assessment tools. Eighteen studies examined active ageing assessment tools at the macro level, while four studies focused on the individual level. Also, fourteen out of the twenty-two studies were based on the World Health Organization's Theoretical Framework for Active Ageing. The literature contained only two active ageing assessment tools designed for specific subgroups of older people.

Conclusion: Future development of active ageing assessment tools should integrate more comprehensive concepts and social theories of active ageing. Additionally, there is a need to explore active ageing measurement tools tailored for diverse subgroups of the older adults at various levels.

Citing Articles

Navigating the maze of active ageing measurement: untangling methodological and theoretical issues in the UJACAS questionnaire.

Bosco A, Lopez A Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025; 37(1):83.

PMID: 40074980 PMC: 11903560. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-025-02953-5.

References
1.
Haque M, Afrin S . Construction of the active aging index in Bangladesh: challenges and opportunities. Heliyon. 2022; 8(10):e10922. PMC: 9547210. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10922. View

2.
Chao T, Jiang X, Sun Y, Yu J . A Space-Time Analysis of Rural Older People's Outdoor Mobility and Its Impact on Self-Rated Health: Evidence from a Taiwanese Rural Village. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(11). PMC: 8198793. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115902. View

3.
Paul C, Ribeiro O, Teixeira L . Active Ageing: An Empirical Approach to the WHO Model. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2012; 2012:382972. PMC: 3501803. DOI: 10.1155/2012/382972. View

4.
Pham V, Chen Y, Duong T, Nguyen T, Chie W . Adaptation and Validation of Active Aging Index Among Older Vietnamese Adults. J Aging Health. 2019; 32(7-8):604-615. DOI: 10.1177/0898264319841524. View

5.
Peters M, Marnie C, Tricco A, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L . Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Implement. 2021; 19(1):3-10. DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000277. View