» Articles » PMID: 39072008

The Safety and Efficacy Profile of Eculizumab in Myasthenic Crisis: a Prospective Small Case Series

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Jul 29
PMID 39072008
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Eculizumab has improved recovery from ventilatory support in myasthenic crisis (MC) cases. However, the safety and efficacy profiles from prospective studies are still lacking. This study aimed to explore eculizumab's safety and efficacy in a prospective case series of patients with refractory MC. We followed a series of anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (MG) patients who received eculizumab as an add-on therapy for 12 weeks during MC to facilitate the weaning process and reduced disease activity. Serum anti-AChR antibodies and peripheral immune molecules associated with the complement pathway were evaluated before and after eculizumab administration. Compared to the baseline Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA)-quantitative MG test (QMG) scores (22.25 ± 4.92) and MG-activities of daily living (MG-ADL; 18.25 ± 2.5) scores at crisis, improvements were observed from 4 weeks (14.5 ± 10.47 and 7.5 ± 7.59, respectively) through 12 weeks (7.5 ± 5.74 and 2.25 ± 3.86, respectively) post-treatment. Muscle strength consistently improved across ocular, bulbar, respiratory, and limb/gross domain groups. One patient died of cardiac failure at 16 weeks. Three cases remained in remission at 24 weeks, with a mean QMG score of 2.67 ± 2.89 and ADL score of 0.33 ± 0.58. No significant side effects were reported. Serum CH50 and soluble C5b-9 levels significantly declined, while there were no significant changes in serum anti-AChR antibody levels, C1q, C5a levels, or peripheral lymphocyte proportions. Eculizumab was well tolerated and showed efficacy in this case series. Large prospective cohort studies with extended follow-up periods are needed to further explore the safety and efficacy profile in real-world practice.

Citing Articles

New and Emerging Biological Therapies for Myasthenia Gravis: A Focussed Review for Clinical Decision-Making.

Gerischer L, Doksani P, Hoffmann S, Meisel A BioDrugs. 2025; 39(2):185-213.

PMID: 39869260 PMC: 11906560. DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00701-1.

References
1.
Su M, Jin S, Jiao K, Yan C, Song J, Xi J . Pneumonia in myasthenia gravis: Microbial etiology and clinical management. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022; 12:1016728. PMC: 9780595. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1016728. View

2.
Sanders D, Hart I, Mantegazza R, Shukla S, Siddiqi Z, De Baets M . An international, phase III, randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil in myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2008; 71(6):400-6. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000312374.95186.cc. View

3.
Kaminski H, Li Z, Richmonds C, Lin F, Medof M . Complement regulators in extraocular muscle and experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis. Exp Neurol. 2004; 189(2):333-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.06.005. View

4.
Peffault de Latour R, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Porcher R, Xhaard A, Rosain J, Castaneda D . Assessing complement blockade in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria receiving eculizumab. Blood. 2014; 125(5):775-83. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-03-560540. View

5.
Barth D, Nabavi Nouri M, Ng E, Nwe P, Bril V . Comparison of IVIg and PLEX in patients with myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2011; 76(23):2017-23. PMC: 3109880. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821e5505. View