» Articles » PMID: 39071984

Applying Dynamical Systems Theory to Improve Personalized Medicine Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Overview
Journal Neurotrauma Rep
Date 2024 Jul 29
PMID 39071984
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A sizable proportion of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) have persistent symptoms and functional impairments months to years following injury. This phenomenon is continually observed despite an explosion of research and interest in improving mTBI clinical outcomes over the last two decades. All pharmacological clinical trials to date have failed to demonstrate improved outcomes for mTBI. One possible explanation for these continued failures is an overly myopic approach to treating mTBI (i.e., testing the effect of a single drug with a specific mechanism on a group of people with highly heterogenous injuries). Clinical presentation and prognosis of mTBI vary considerably between patients, and yet we continue to assess group-level effects of a homogenized treatment. We need to utilize an equally complex treatment approach to match the extraordinary complexity of the human brain. Dynamical systems theory has been used to describe systems composed of multiple subsystems who function somewhat independently but are ultimately interconnected. This theory was popularized in the motor control literature as an overarching framework for how the mind and body connect to interact and move through the environment. However, the human body can be viewed as a dynamical system composed of multiple subsystems (i.e., organ systems) who have isolated functions, which are also codependent on the health and performance of other interconnected organ systems. In this perspective piece, we will use the example of mTBI in the obese patient to demonstrate how broadening our approach to treatment of the individual (and not necessarily the injury) may ultimately yield improved outcomes. Furthermore, we will explore clinical and pre-clinical evidence demonstrating multiple system interactions in the context of obesity and TBI and discuss how expanding our understanding of the mechanistic interplay between multiple organ systems may ultimately provide a more personalized treatment approach for this mTBI patient subpopulation.

References
1.
Eguchi Y, Kitajima Y, Hyogo H, Takahashi H, Kojima M, Ono M . Pilot study of liraglutide effects in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with glucose intolerance in Japanese patients (LEAN-J). Hepatol Res. 2014; 45(3):269-78. DOI: 10.1111/hepr.12351. View

2.
McGlennon T, Buchwald J, Pories W, Yu F, Roberts A, Ahnfeldt E . Bypassing TBI: Metabolic Surgery and the Link between Obesity and Traumatic Brain Injury-a Review. Obes Surg. 2020; 30(12):4704-4714. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-05065-3. View

3.
Henn R, Elzinga S, Glass E, Parent R, Guo K, Allouch A . Obesity-induced neuroinflammation and cognitive impairment in young adult versus middle-aged mice. Immun Ageing. 2022; 19(1):67. PMC: 9773607. DOI: 10.1186/s12979-022-00323-7. View

4.
Ferris L, Kontos A, Eagle S, Elbin R, Collins M, Mucha A . Utility of VOMS, SCAT3, and ImPACT Baseline Evaluations for Acute Concussion Identification in Collegiate Athletes: Findings From the NCAA-DoD Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium. Am J Sports Med. 2022; 50(4):1106-1119. DOI: 10.1177/03635465211072261. View

5.
Christmas A, Reynolds J, Wilson A, Franklin G, Miller F, Richardson J . Morbid obesity impacts mortality in blunt trauma. Am Surg. 2007; 73(11):1122-5. View