» Articles » PMID: 39070967

Development and Application of Breadth-Depth-Context (BDC), a Conceptual Framework for Measuring Technology Engagement with a Qualified Clinical Data Registry

Overview
Journal JAMIA Open
Date 2024 Jul 29
PMID 39070967
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Despite the proliferation of dashboards that display performance data derived from Qualified Clinical Data Registries (QCDR), the degree to which clinicians and practices engage with such dashboards has not been well described. We aimed to develop a conceptual framework for assessing user engagement with dashboard technology and to demonstrate its application to a rheumatology QCDR.

Materials And Methods: We developed the BDC (Breadth-Depth-Context) framework, which included concepts of breadth (derived from dashboard sessions), depth (derived from dashboard actions), and context (derived from practice characteristics). We demonstrated its application via user log data from the American College of Rheumatology's Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) registry to define engagement profiles and characterize practice-level factors associated with different profiles.

Results: We applied the BDC framework to 213 ambulatory practices from the RISE registry in 2020-2021, and classified practices into 4 engagement profiles: not engaged (8%), minimally engaged (39%), moderately engaged (34%), and most engaged (19%). Practices with more patients and with specific electronic health record vendors (eClinicalWorks and eMDs) had a higher likelihood of being in the most engaged group, even after adjusting for other factors.

Discussion: We developed the BDC framework to characterize user engagement with a registry dashboard and demonstrated its use in a specialty QCDR. The application of the BDC framework revealed a wide range of breadth and depth of use and that specific contextual factors were associated with nature of engagement.

Conclusion: Going forward, the BDC framework can be used to study engagement with similar dashboards.

References
1.
Coles E, Anderson J, Maxwell M, Harris F, M Gray N, Milner G . The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a realist review. Syst Rev. 2020; 9(1):94. PMC: 7184709. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01344-3. View

2.
Khairat S, Marc D, Crosby W, Al Sanousi A . Reasons For Physicians Not Adopting Clinical Decision Support Systems: Critical Analysis. JMIR Med Inform. 2018; 6(2):e24. PMC: 5932331. DOI: 10.2196/medinform.8912. View

3.
Miller R, Sim I, Newman J . Electronic medical records in solo/small groups: a qualitative study of physician user types. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004; 107(Pt 1):658-62. View

4.
Li J, Ringold S, Curtis J, Michaud K, Johansson T, Yun H . Effects of the SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic on U.S. rheumatology outpatient care delivery and use of telemedicine: an analysis of data from the RISE registry. Rheumatol Int. 2021; 41(10):1755-1761. PMC: 8327041. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-04960-x. View

5.
Greenberg K, Poupko T, Sorotzkin D, Keidar O, Zwas D . Development and usage of a health recommendation web tool (HeaRT) designed to inform women of personalized preventive health recommendations. Internet Interv. 2023; 31:100599. PMC: 9813537. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100599. View