» Articles » PMID: 39070843

Efficacy and Safety of Xileisan Combined with Mesalazine for Ulcerative Colitis: A Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Jul 29
PMID 39070843
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The benefits and risks of Xileisan (XLS) in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) remain unclear.

Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of XLS and mesalazine when treating UC.

Methods: We searched eight databases for clinical trials evaluating the combination of XLS and mesalazine in the treatment of UC, up to January 2024. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were performed using Revman 5.3 and TSA 0.9.5.10 beta, respectively.

Results: The present study included 13 clinical studies involving 990 patients, of which 501 patients received XLS combined with mesalazine while 489 patients received mesalazine alone. The meta-analysis showed that, in terms of efficacy, the combination of XLS and mesalazine significantly improved the clinical efficacy rate by 22% [risk ratio (RR) = 1.22; 95%CI: 1.15-1.28; < 0.00001] and mucosal improvement rate by 25% (RR = 1.25; 95%CI: 1.12-1.39; = 0.0001), while significantly reducing the duration of abdominal pain by 2.25 days [mean difference (MD) = -2.25; 95%CI: -3.35 to -1.14; < 0.0001], diarrhea by 2.06 days (MD = -2.06; 95%CI: -3.92 to -0.20; = 0.03), hematochezia by 2.32 days (MD = -2.32; 95%CI: -4.02 to -0.62; = 0.008), tumor necrosis factor alpha by 16.25 ng/mL (MD = -16.25; 95%CI: -20.48 to -12.01; < 0.00001), and interleukin-6 by 14.14 ng/mL (MD = -14.14; 95%CI: -24.89 to -3.39; = 0.01). The TSA indicated conclusiveness in the meta-analysis of the efficacy endpoints. In terms of safety, the meta-analysis revealed that the combination of XLS and mesalazine did not increase the occurrence of total and gastrointestinal adverse events, abdominal distension, and erythema ( > 0.05). The TSA showed non conclusive findings in the meta-analysis of the safety endpoints. Harbord's test showed no publication bias ( = 0.734).

Conclusion: Treatment with XLS alleviated the clinical symptoms, intestinal mucosal injury, and inflammatory response in patients with UC, while demonstrating good safety.

References
1.
Rosiou K, Selinger C . Acute severe ulcerative colitis: management advice for internal medicine and emergency physicians. Intern Emerg Med. 2021; 16(6):1433-1442. PMC: 8354863. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-021-02704-0. View

2.
Moss A, Peppercorn M . The risks and the benefits of mesalazine as a treatment for ulcerative colitis. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2007; 6(2):99-107. DOI: 10.1517/14740338.6.2.99. View

3.
Christensen K, Ainsworth M, Skougaard M, Steenholdt C, Buhl S, Brynskov J . Identifying and understanding disease burden in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2022; 9(1). PMC: 9621179. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-000994. View

4.
Wehkamp J, Stange E . Recent advances and emerging therapies in the non-surgical management of ulcerative colitis. F1000Res. 2018; 7. PMC: 6081982. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.15159.1. View

5.
Murray A, Nguyen T, Parker C, Feagan B, MacDonald J . Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 8:CD000544. PMC: 8094989. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000544.pub5. View