» Articles » PMID: 39068511

Enhanced Postoperative Pain Management and Mobility Following Arthroscopic Knee Surgery: A Comparative Study of Adductor Canal Block with and Without IPACK Block

Overview
Journal Med Sci Monit
Date 2024 Jul 28
PMID 39068511
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

BACKGROUND Arthroscopic knee surgery (AKS) is minimally invasive, reducing hospital stay compared to traditional surgery, but postoperative pain remains a significant issue. This study compared the analgesic and functional outcomes following AKS following anesthesia using adductor canal block (ACB) with and without anesthesia using the interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee (IPACK) block under spinal anesthesia (SA). MATERIAL AND METHODS We randomly allocated 120 patients into 3 groups: IPACK+ACB+SA for Group A (n=40), ACB+SA for Group B (n=40), and SA for Group C (n=40). The outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) score evaluated at rest and during activity at 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h postoperatively, the frequency of administration of postoperative rescue analgesic, and the maximal walking distance at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively. RESULTS Compared with Group C, the VAS scores in Group A were significantly lower at 48 h postoperatively (P<0.05). There was a significant difference in the frequency of postoperative rescue analgesia use among the 3 groups (P=0.001). In a subgroup analysis of meniscus shaping under arthroscopy, the resting VAS score in Group A was lower than that in Group B and Group C at 48 h postoperatively (P<0.05). The maximum walking distance of Group A was longer than that of Group B and Group C at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS The effect of postoperative analgesia in the group receiving IPACK combined with ACB after AKS was obviously superior. In arthroscopic meniscus repair surgery, the duration of analgesia was longer, and the maximum walking distance at 48 h postoperatively was longer.

References
1.
Smulders P, Ten Hoope W, Baumann H, Hermanides J, Hemke R, Beenen L . Adductor canal block techniques do not lead to involvement of sciatic nerve branches: a radiological cadaveric study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023; 49(3):174-178. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104227. View

2.
Tandra V, Koti M, Kohli S, Atta M, Khanal P, Khan O . Does local infiltration analgesia in total joint arthroplasty offer any protection from prosthetic joint infections? An invitro experimental study. J Perioper Pract. 2022; 33(10):324-328. DOI: 10.1177/17504589221137981. View

3.
Khan M, Tauheed N, Siddiqui A, Sabir A, Haleem S . Adductor Canal Block Versus Local Infiltration Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e57408. PMC: 11062595. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57408. View

4.
Sreckovic S, Tulic G, Jokanovic M, Dabetic U, Kadija M . Delayed foot drop after a combination of the adductor canal block and IPACK block following total knee arthroplasty. J Clin Anesth. 2021; 73:110363. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110363. View

5.
Domagalska M, Reysner T, Kowalski G, Daroszewski P, Mularski A, Wieczorowska-Tobis K . Pain Management, Functional Recovery, and Stress Response Expressed by NLR and PLR after the iPACK Block Combined with Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Prospective, Randomised, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial. J Clin Med. 2023; 12(22). PMC: 10672046. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12227088. View