» Articles » PMID: 39065833

Accelerometer Thresholds for Estimating Physical Activity Intensity Levels in Infants: A Preliminary Study

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2024 Jul 27
PMID 39065833
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Lack of physical activity (PA) at a young age can result in health issues. Thus, monitoring PA is important. Wearable accelerometers are the preferred tool to monitor PA in children. Validated thresholds are used to classify activity intensity levels, e.g., sedentary, light, and moderate-to-vigorous, in ambulatory children. No previous work has developed accelerometer thresholds for infancy (pre-ambulatory children). Therefore, this work aims to develop accelerometer thresholds for PA intensity levels in pre-ambulatory infants. Infants (n = 10) were placed in a supine position and allowed free movement. Their movements were synchronously captured using video cameras and accelerometers worn on each ankle. The video data were labeled by activity intensity level (sedentary, light, and moderate-to-vigorous) in two-second epochs using observational rating (gold standard). Accelerometer thresholds were developed for acceleration and jerk using two optimization approaches. Four sets of thresholds were developed for dual (two ankles) and for single-worn (one ankle) accelerometers. Of these, for a typical use case, we recommend using acceleration-based thresholds of 1.00 m/s to distinguish sedentary and light activity and 2.60 m/s to distinguish light and moderate-to-vigorous activity. Acceleration and jerk are both suitable for measuring PA.

Citing Articles

Physical Activity in Pre-Ambulatory Children with Cerebral Palsy: An Exploratory Validation Study to Distinguish Active vs. Sedentary Time Using Wearable Sensors.

Orlando J, Smith B, Hafer J, Paremski A, Amodeo M, Lobo M Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(4).

PMID: 40006490 PMC: 11860784. DOI: 10.3390/s25041261.


The Performance of Ankle- and Waist-Based Accelerometry in Quantifying Physical Activity Intensity Among 6- to 24-Month-Year-Olds: A Semistructured Laboratory Study.

Dorris H, Carlson D, Ballarino G, Lopez N, Emond J Child Care Health Dev. 2025; 51(1):e70035.

PMID: 39806550 PMC: 11730355. DOI: 10.1111/cch.70035.


Identifying Infant Body Position from Inertial Sensors with Machine Learning: Which Parameters Matter?.

Duda-Golawska J, Rogowski A, Laudanska Z, Zygierewicz J, Tomalski P Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(23).

PMID: 39686346 PMC: 11644974. DOI: 10.3390/s24237809.

References
1.
Horger M, Marsiliani R, DeMasi A, Allia A, Berger S . Researcher Choices for Infant Sleep Assessment: Parent Report, Actigraphy, and a Novel Video System. J Genet Psychol. 2021; 182(4):218-235. DOI: 10.1080/00221325.2021.1905600. View

2.
Smith B, Trujillo-Priego I, Lane C, Finley J, Horak F . Daily Quantity of Infant Leg Movement: Wearable Sensor Algorithm and Relationship to Walking Onset. Sensors (Basel). 2015; 15(8):19006-20. PMC: 4570357. DOI: 10.3390/s150819006. View

3.
Hewitt L, Stanley R, Cliff D, Okely A . Objective measurement of tummy time in infants (0-6 months): A validation study. PLoS One. 2019; 14(2):e0210977. PMC: 6392225. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210977. View

4.
Trost S, Fees B, Haar S, Murray A, Crowe L . Identification and validity of accelerometer cut-points for toddlers. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011; 20(11):2317-9. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2011.364. View

5.
Brond J, Andersen L, Arvidsson D . Generating ActiGraph Counts from Raw Acceleration Recorded by an Alternative Monitor. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017; 49(11):2351-2360. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001344. View