» Articles » PMID: 39064571

Effect of Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems on Short-Term Outcomes After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Jul 27
PMID 39064571
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: To evaluate the effects of the pulse index continuous cardiac output and MostCare Pressure Recording Analytical Method hemodynamic monitoring systems on short-term graft and patient outcomes during living donor liver transplantation in adult patients. : Overall, 163 adult patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation between January 2018 and March 2022 and met the study inclusion criteria were divided into two groups based on the hemodynamic monitoring systems used during surgery: the MostCare Pressure Recording Analytical Method group ( = 73) and the pulse index continuous cardiac output group ( = 90). The groups were compared with respect to preoperative clinicodemographic features (age, sex, body mass index, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, and Model for End-stage Liver Disease score), intraoperative clinical characteristics, and postoperative biochemical parameters (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, and platelet count). : There were no significant between-group differences with respect to recipient age, sex, body mass index, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, Child, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, ejection fraction, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, surgery time, anhepatic phase, cold ischemia time, warm ischemia time, erythrocyte suspension use, human albumin use, crystalloid use, urine output, hospital stay, and intensive care unit stay. However, there was a significant difference in fresh frozen plasma use ( < 0.001) and platelet use ( = 0.037). : The clinical and biochemical outcomes are not significantly different between pulse index continuous cardiac output and MostCare Pressure Recording Analytical Method as hemodynamic monitoring systems in living donor liver transplantation. However, the MostCare Pressure Recording Analytical Method is more economical and minimally invasive.

References
1.
Perilli V, Aceto P, Modesti C, Ciocchetti P, Sacco T, Vitale F . Low values of left ventricular ejection time in the post-anhepatic phase may be associated with occurrence of primary graft dysfunction after orthotopic liver transplantation: results of a single-centre case-control study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012; 16(10):1433-40. View

2.
Olthoff K, Kulik L, Samstein B, Kaminski M, Abecassis M, Emond J . Validation of a current definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients and analysis of risk factors. Liver Transpl. 2010; 16(8):943-9. DOI: 10.1002/lt.22091. View

3.
Donati A, Carsetti A, Tondi S, Scorcella C, Domizi R, Damiani E . Thermodilution vs pressure recording analytical method in hemodynamic stabilized patients. J Crit Care. 2013; 29(2):260-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.11.003. View

4.
Singh S, Nasa V, Tandon M . Perioperative monitoring in liver transplant patients. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015; 2(3):271-8. PMC: 3940305. DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2012.06.003. View

5.
Chen Z, Ju W, Chen C, Wang T, Yu J, Hong X . Application of various surgical techniques in liver transplantation: a retrospective study. Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(17):1367. PMC: 8506559. DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-1945. View