» Articles » PMID: 39062667

Does Sunlight Affect the Quality for Purposes of DNA Analysis of Blood Stain Evidence Collected from Different Surfaces?

Overview
Journal Genes (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Date 2024 Jul 27
PMID 39062667
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of sunlight on the degradation of DNA samples taken from blood stains from different types of surfaces. A blood sample obtained from a single male donor was placed on seven different surfaces (galvanized sheet, iron rod, newspaper, white printer paper, glass, soil, and ceramic panel). Samples were kept, during a 4-week summer period, in a room, but next to an open window. Every 7 days, 1 mm of blood sample was collected from each substrate and stored in labeled tube for later analysis. DNA was extracted with the Chelex method, amplified using AmpFISTR Minifiler Plus Amplification Kit, and quantified using a Quantifiler Human DNA Quantification kit. After 7 days of sun exposure, the highest DNA concentration was determined to be from the sample from a galvanized sheet stain, followed by, in order of decreasing concentration, the ceramic panel, glass, newspaper, iron rod, and white printer paper surface. As expected, the DNA concentration from all samples decreased as the sunlight exposure time progressed. The results obtained after the amplification in the MiniFiler system were in correlation with the DNA concentrations measured by the qPCR method for all samples, except for the glass, soil, and white printer paper samples. The obtained data show that DNA degradation is correlated to the length of sunlight exposure and to the type of surface the samples are collected from. A negative qPCR result does not mean negative PCR amplification in the STR system; therefore, both methods should be applied when analyzing forensic samples collected from trace evidence.

Citing Articles

A Ge.F.I. Collaborative Study: Evaluating Reproducibility and Accuracy of a DNA-Methylation-Based Age-Predictive Assay for Routine Implementation in Forensic Casework.

Onofri M, Alessandrini F, Aneli S, Buscemi L, Chierto E, Fabbri M Electrophoresis. 2025; 46(1-2):76-91.

PMID: 39763091 PMC: 11773317. DOI: 10.1002/elps.202400190.

References
1.
Arsenault H, Kuffel A, Daeid N, Gray A . Trace DNA and its persistence on various surfaces: A long term study investigating the influence of surface type and environmental conditions - Part one, metals. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2024; 70:103011. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103011. View

2.
Senge T, Madea B, Junge A, Rothschild M, Schneider P . STRs, mini STRs and SNPs--a comparative study for typing degraded DNA. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2011; 13(2):68-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2010.12.001. View

3.
Walsh P, Metzger D, Higuchi R . Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques. 1991; 10(4):506-13. View

4.
Tsai Y, Olson B . Rapid method for separation of bacterial DNA from humic substances in sediments for polymerase chain reaction. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992; 58(7):2292-5. PMC: 195770. DOI: 10.1128/aem.58.7.2292-2295.1992. View

5.
Medina-Paz F, Kuba B, Kryvorutsky E, Roca G, Zapico S . Assessment of Blood and Semen Detection and DNA Collection from Swabs up to Three Months after Deposition on Five Different Cloth Materials. Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(6). PMC: 10971324. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25063522. View