» Articles » PMID: 39061024

MARCH1 Negatively Regulates TBK1-mTOR Signaling Pathway by Ubiquitinating TBK1

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Jul 26
PMID 39061024
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: TBK1 positively regulates the growth factor-mediated mTOR signaling pathway by phosphorylating mTOR. However, it remains unclear how the TBK1-mTOR signaling pathway is regulated. Considering that STING not only interacts with TBK1 but also with MARCH1, we speculated that MARCH1 might regulate the mTOR signaling pathway by targeting TBK1. The aim of this study was to determine whether MARCH1 regulates the mTOR signaling pathway by targeting TBK1.

Methods: The co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay was used to verify the interaction between MARCH1 with STING or TBK1. The ubiquitination of STING or TBK1 was analyzed using denatured co-immunoprecipitation. The level of proteins detected in the co-immunoprecipitation or denatured co-immunoprecipitation samples were determined by Western blotting. Stable knocked-down cells were constructed by infecting lentivirus bearing the related shRNA sequences. Scratch wound healing and clonogenic cell survival assays were used to detect the migration and proliferation of breast cancer cells.

Results: We showed that MARCH1 played an important role in growth factor-induced the TBK1- mTOR signaling pathway. MARCH1 overexpression attenuated the growth factor-induced activation of mTOR signaling pathway, whereas its deficiency resulted in the opposite effect. Mechanistically, MARCH1 interacted with and promoted the K63-linked ubiquitination of TBK1. This ubiquitination of TBK1 then attenuated its interaction with mTOR, thereby inhibiting the growth factor-induced mTOR signaling pathway. Importantly, faster proliferation induced by MARCH1 deficiency was weakened by mTOR, STING, or TBK1 inhibition.

Conclusion: MARCH1 suppressed growth factors mediated the mTOR signaling pathway by targeting the STING-TBK1-mTOR axis.

References
1.
Corrales L, Glickman L, McWhirter S, Kanne D, Sivick K, Katibah G . Direct Activation of STING in the Tumor Microenvironment Leads to Potent and Systemic Tumor Regression and Immunity. Cell Rep. 2015; 11(7):1018-30. PMC: 4440852. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.031. View

2.
Jacinto E, Loewith R, Schmidt A, Lin S, Ruegg M, Hall A . Mammalian TOR complex 2 controls the actin cytoskeleton and is rapamycin insensitive. Nat Cell Biol. 2004; 6(11):1122-8. DOI: 10.1038/ncb1183. View

3.
Galluzzi L, Vanpouille-Box C, Bakhoum S, Demaria S . SnapShot: CGAS-STING Signaling. Cell. 2018; 173(1):276-276.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.015. View

4.
Woo S, Fuertes M, Corrales L, Spranger S, Furdyna M, Leung M . STING-dependent cytosolic DNA sensing mediates innate immune recognition of immunogenic tumors. Immunity. 2014; 41(5):830-42. PMC: 4384884. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.10.017. View

5.
Baravalle G, Park H, McSweeney M, Ohmura-Hoshino M, Matsuki Y, Ishido S . Ubiquitination of CD86 is a key mechanism in regulating antigen presentation by dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2011; 187(6):2966-73. PMC: 4496154. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101643. View