» Articles » PMID: 39058316

Carbohydrate Estimation Accuracy of Two Commercially Available Smartphone Applications Vs Estimation by Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes: A Comparative Study

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2024 Jul 26
PMID 39058316
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite remarkable progress in diabetes technology, most systems still require estimating meal carbohydrate (CHO) content for meal-time insulin delivery. Emerging smartphone applications may obviate this need, but performance data in relation to patient estimates remain scarce.

Objective: The objective is to assess the accuracy of two commercial CHO estimation applications, SNAQ and Calorie Mama, and compare their performance with the estimation accuracy of people with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Methods: Carbohydrate estimates of 53 individuals with T1D (aged ≥16 years) were compared with those of SNAQ (food recognition + quantification) and Calorie Mama (food recognition + adjustable standard portion size). Twenty-six cooked meals were prepared at the hospital kitchen. Each participant estimated the CHO content of two meals in three different sizes without assistance. Participants then used SNAQ for CHO quantification in one meal and Calorie Mama for the other (all three sizes). Accuracy was the estimate's deviation from ground-truth CHO content (weight multiplied by nutritional facts from recipe database). Furthermore, the applications were rated using the Mars-G questionnaire.

Results: Participants' mean ± standard deviation (SD) absolute error was 21 ± 21.5 g (71 ± 72.7%). Calorie Mama had a mean absolute error of 24 ± 36.5 g (81.2 ± 123.4%). With a mean absolute error of 13.1 ± 11.3 g (44.3 ± 38.2%), SNAQ outperformed the estimation accuracy of patients and Calorie Mama (both > .05). Error consistency (quantified by the within-participant SD) did not significantly differ between the methods.

Conclusions: SNAQ may provide effective CHO estimation support for people with T1D, particularly those with large or inconsistent CHO estimation errors. Its impact on glucose control remains to be evaluated.

References
1.
Bell K, Barclay A, Petocz P, Colagiuri S, Brand-Miller J . Efficacy of carbohydrate counting in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014; 2(2):133-40. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70144-X. View

2.
Smart C, Ross K, Edge J, Collins C, Colyvas K, King B . Children and adolescents on intensive insulin therapy maintain postprandial glycaemic control without precise carbohydrate counting. Diabet Med. 2009; 26(3):279-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02669.x. View

3.
Herzig D, Nakas C, Stalder J, Kosinski C, Laesser C, Dehais J . Volumetric Food Quantification Using Computer Vision on a Depth-Sensing Smartphone: Preclinical Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020; 8(3):e15294. PMC: 7142738. DOI: 10.2196/15294. View

4.
Sasaki Y, Sato K, Kobayashi S, Asakura K . Nutrient and Food Group Prediction as Orchestrated by an Automated Image Recognition System in a Smartphone App (CALO mama): Validation Study. JMIR Form Res. 2022; 6(1):e31875. PMC: 8787663. DOI: 10.2196/31875. View

5.
Rhyner D, Loher H, Dehais J, Anthimopoulos M, Shevchik S, Botwey R . Carbohydrate Estimation by a Mobile Phone-Based System Versus Self-Estimations of Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18(5):e101. PMC: 4880742. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5567. View