» Articles » PMID: 39057130

Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: Complete Versus Partial Hydatidiform Moles

Overview
Journal Diseases
Date 2024 Jul 26
PMID 39057130
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hydatidiform moles, including both complete and partial moles, constitute a subset of gestational trophoblastic diseases characterized by abnormal fertilization resulting in villous hydrops and trophoblastic hyperplasia with or without embryonic development. This involves chromosomal abnormalities, where one or two sperms fertilize an empty oocyte (complete hydatidiform mole (CHM); mostly 46,XX) or two sperms fertilize one oocyte (partial hydatidiform mole (PHM); mostly 69,XXY). Notably, recurrent occurrences are associated with abnormal genomic imprinting of maternal effect genes such as (chromosome 19q13.4) and (chromosome 6q1). Ongoing efforts to enhance identification methods have led to the identification of growth-specific markers, including p57 (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1C; ), which shows intact nuclear expression in the villous cytotrophoblast and villous stromal cells in PHMs and loss of expression in CHMs. Treatment of hydatidiform moles includes dilation and curettage for uterine evacuation of the molar pregnancy followed by surveillance of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) levels to confirm disease resolution and rule out the development of any gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. In this review, we provide a synopsis of the existing literature on hydatidiform moles, their diagnosis, histopathologic features, and management.

References
1.
Prabhu I, Rosenbaum A . Hydatidiform Mole in a Patient With a Concern for Neoplasia: A Case Report. Cureus. 2020; 12(9):e10319. PMC: 7544604. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.10319. View

2.
Lewis G, DeScipio C, Murphy K, Haley L, Beierl K, Mosier S . Characterization of androgenetic/biparental mosaic/chimeric conceptions, including those with a molar component: morphology, p57 immnohistochemistry, molecular genotyping, and risk of persistent gestational trophoblastic disease. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2013; 32(2):199-214. DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e3182630d8c. View

3.
La Vecchia C, Franceschi S, Parazzini F, Fasoli M, Decarli A, Gallus G . Risk factors for gestational trophoblastic disease in Italy. Am J Epidemiol. 1985; 121(3):457-64. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114018. View

4.
Zhao Y, Xiong G, Zhang X, Hang B . Is Ki-67 of Diagnostic Value in Distinguishing Between Partial and Complete Hydatidiform Moles? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anticancer Res. 2018; 38(2):1105-1110. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12329. View

5.
Sebire N . Histopathological diagnosis of hydatidiform mole: contemporary features and clinical implications. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2010; 29(1):1-16. DOI: 10.3109/15513810903266138. View