Self-guided Online Therapeutic Assessment in Substance Abuse Care: A Conflict Analysis Implementation and Feasibility Case Study

Overview

Journal Comput Hum Behav Rep

Date 2024 Jul 26

PMID 39055610

Authors

Maxwell Levis

Dana J Ludmer

Brian Shiner

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

"Michael" is a 60-year-old Black male receiving substance abuse treatment at a Veterans Affairs hospital. As part of Michael's care, he participated in an implementation and feasibility trial evaluating Conflict Analysis (CA), a self-guided online therapeutic assessment. CA leverages innovative diagnostic and therapeutic resources to improve client engagement and therapeutic achievement. CA employs narrative formats, encouraging patients to frame experiences within personal vocabulary, and provides personalized feedback automatically extracted from patient responses. CA is self-guided, widely accessible, and has few costs. Paper presents Michael's protocol, associated therapeutic outcome measures, and psychologist's evaluation of CA benefits. Michael completed brief online CA deployment containing a wellness-based personality inventory, four narrative tasks, and an interactive feedback template. Michael completed insight, stress, depression, wellbeing, and perceived diagnostic and therapeutic benefit measures at baseline, post, and three-week follow-up. Interventions took 2.5 h. Attending psychologist reviewed CA protocols and completed diagnostic and therapeutic questionnaires. Michael's record identifies elevated dominance. Protocol highlights Michael's drinking as mechanism to lessen social anxieties, anger, and competitiveness. Results suggest CA encouraged increased motivation to change, treatment engagement, and reduced depression. Psychologist rated benefit at maximum threshold. Implications include improving assessment efficacy, increasing online care opportunities, and expanding CA research.

References

Sheehan D, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan K, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E . The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999; 59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57. View

Roe D, Davidson L . Self and narrative in schizophrenia: time to author a new story. Med Humanit. 2013; 31(2):89-94. DOI: 10.1136/jmh.2005.000214. View

Sloan D, Sawyer A, Lowmaster S, Wernick J, Marx B . Efficacy of Narrative Writing as an Intervention for PTSD: Does the Evidence Support Its Use?. J Contemp Psychother. 2015; 45(4):215-225. PMC: 4669193. DOI: 10.1007/s10879-014-9292-x. View

Yates B, Taub J . Assessing the costs, benefits, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit of psychological assessment: we should, we can, and here's how. Psychol Assess. 2003; 15(4):478-95. DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.478. View

Barber J, Luborsky L, Diguer L, Crits-Christoph P . A comparison of core conflictual relationship themes before psychotherapy and during early sessions. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995; 63(1):145-8. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.63.1.145. View

Pennebaker J . Telling stories: the health benefits of narrative. Lit Med. 2000; 19(1):3-18. DOI: 10.1353/lm.2000.0011. View

Beck A, Baruch E, Balter J, Steer R, Warman D . A new instrument for measuring insight: the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale. Schizophr Res. 2004; 68(2-3):319-29. DOI: 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00189-0. View

de Graaf L, Gerhards S, Arntz A, Riper H, Metsemakers J, Evers S . Clinical effectiveness of online computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy without support for depression in primary care: randomised trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2009; 195(1):73-80. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.054429. View

Smith J, Handler L, Nash M . Therapeutic assessment for preadolescent boys with oppositional defiant disorder: a replicated single-case time-series design. Psychol Assess. 2010; 22(3):593-602. DOI: 10.1037/a0019697. View

10.

Crossley S, Kyle K, McNamara D . Sentiment Analysis and Social Cognition Engine (SEANCE): An automatic tool for sentiment, social cognition, and social-order analysis. Behav Res Methods. 2016; 49(3):803-821. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0743-z. View

11.

Shedler J . The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. Am Psychol. 2010; 65(2):98-109. DOI: 10.1037/a0018378. View

12.

Taylor-Rodgers E, Batterham P . Evaluation of an online psychoeducation intervention to promote mental health help seeking attitudes and intentions among young adults: randomised controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 2014; 168:65-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.06.047. View

13.

Witztum E, Margolin J, Levy A . Stigma, labelling and psychiatric misdiagnosis: origins and outcomes. Med Law. 1995; 14(7-8):659-69. View

14.

Levis M, Levis A . Contextual assessment: evaluating a novel self-guided online therapeutic assessment. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2020; 25(2):206-215. PMC: 11151187. DOI: 10.1080/13651501.2020.1794010. View

15.

Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R . A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983; 24(4):385-96. View

16.

Lorber W, Garcia H . Not supposed to feel this: traditional masculinity in psychotherapy with male veterans returning from Afghanistan and Iraq. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2012; 47(3):296-305. DOI: 10.1037/a0021161. View

17.

Finn S . Therapeutic assessment of a man with "ADD". J Pers Assess. 2003; 80(2):115-29. DOI: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8002_01. View

18.

Engelman D, Allyn J, Crisi A, Finn S, Fischer C, Nakamura N . "Why am I so stuck?": A Collaborative/Therapeutic Assessment Case Discussion. J Pers Assess. 2016; 98(4):360-73. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1119154. View

19.

Levis A . The formal theory of behaviour. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1977; 23(2):79-93. DOI: 10.1177/002076407702300201. View

20.

McDonald A, Eccles J, Fallahkhair S, Critchley H . Online psychotherapy: trailblazing digital healthcare. BJPsych Bull. 2019; 44(2):60-66. PMC: 7283124. DOI: 10.1192/bjb.2019.66. View