» Articles » PMID: 39053453

Torque and Power of Knee Extensor Muscles at Individualized Isokinetic Angular Velocities

Overview
Journal J Int Med Res
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Jul 25
PMID 39053453
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Existing isokinetic contractions are characterized using standardized angular velocities, which can induce differing adaptations. Here, we characterized the variation in the isokinetic parameters of knee extensors according to individualized angular velocity (IAV).

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of 19 young, healthy men. We measured the maximum angular velocity (MAV) of concentric knee extension using the isotonic mode of an isokinetic dynamometer. Isometric and isokinetic (at angular velocities corresponding to 100%, 70%, 40%, and 10% of each individual's MAV) knee extensor contractions were performed, and the peak torque and mean power were recorded.

Results: Peak torque significantly decreased with increasing IAV (129.42 ± 25.04, 84.37 ± 20.97, and 56.42 ± 16.18 Nm at 40%, 70%, and 100%, respectively), except for isometric contraction (233.36 ± 47.85) and at 10% of MAV (208 ± 48.55). At the mean power, 10% of MAV (74.52 ± 20.84 W) was significantly lower than the faster IAV (176.32 ± 49.64, 161.53 ± 56.55, and 145.95 ± 50.64 W at 40%, 70%, and 100%, respectively), and 100% was significantly lower than 40%.

Conclusion: The optimized IAV for isokinetic contraction to improve power output while maintaining torque is 10% to 40% of MAV. IAV may reflect both the velocity and force components of power because individuals do not have the same angular velocity.

References
1.
Bohannon R, Magasi S, Bubela D, Wang Y, Gershon R . Grip and knee extension muscle strength reflect a common construct among adults. Muscle Nerve. 2012; 46(4):555-8. PMC: 3448119. DOI: 10.1002/mus.23350. View

2.
Kraemer W, Ratamess N . Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36(4):674-88. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000121945.36635.61. View

3.
Gregor R, Edgerton V, Perrine J, CAMPION D, Debus C . Torque-velocity relationships and muscle fiber composition in elite female athletes. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1979; 47(2):388-92. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1979.47.2.388. View

4.
Cramer J, Housh T, Weir J, Johnson G, Berning J, Perry S . Gender, muscle, and velocity comparisons of mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses during isokinetic muscle actions. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2004; 14(2):116-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2003.00317.x. View

5.
Oliveira A, Negro F . Neural control of matched motor units during muscle shortening and lengthening at increasing velocities. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021; 130(6):1798-1813. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00043.2021. View