» Articles » PMID: 39050775

Relevance of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Cancer: Detection of Underrated Psychological Distress of Palliative Care Patients in an Outpatient Setting

Overview
Journal Palliat Med Rep
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2024 Jul 25
PMID 39050775
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The overall level of physical and psychological symptom burden of advanced cancer patients (ACP) in an outpatient setting is notoriously difficult to assess. Therefore, more efficient and objective assessment is needed to accomplish this important task.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the physical and psychological symptom burden rated by palliative care nurse (PCN) versus patient's self-rating.

Design: This retrospective German cohort study analyzed symptom burden using an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM). After referral to an outpatient specialized palliative care team, a PCN assessed the patient's symptoms both up to three months before initial presentation (IP) and at IP.Group differences were identified using analyses of variance (ANOVA). Further descriptive analysis of patient characteristics was used.

Subjects: The study enrolled 164 ACP who were referred to a specialized palliative care (SPC) team. Mean age was 62 (± 12.6) years. Gastrointestinal ( = 46; 28.0%), lung ( = 32; 19.5%), and breast cancer ( = 34; 20.7%) were the most common entities.

Results: Most frequent reasons for referral were pain ( = 55; 33.5%) and social care problems ( = 36; 22.0%). Patients reported significantly higher grades on depression ( = 144; = -2.8, = 0.005), anxiety ( = 144; = -2.376, = 0.018), and worsened general condition ( = 139; = -7.005, < 0.001).

Conclusion: ACP in an outpatient setting were more frequently referred to SPC for pain management and assistance with social problems with regard to the cancer and its limitations. Psychological distress was underrated by the PCN in comparison with patient self-reporting through ePROM. This underlines the importance of self-reported outcome measurement.

References
1.
Greer J, Jackson V, Meier D, Temel J . Early integration of palliative care services with standard oncology care for patients with advanced cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013; 63(5):349-63. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21192. View

2.
Basch E, Jia X, Heller G, Barz A, Sit L, Fruscione M . Adverse symptom event reporting by patients vs clinicians: relationships with clinical outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101(23):1624-32. PMC: 2786917. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp386. View

3.
Eid R, Haddad F, Kourie H, Kattan J . Electronic patient-reported outcomes: a revolutionary strategy in cancer care. Future Oncol. 2017; 13(27):2397-2399. DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0345. View

4.
Velikova G, Booth L, Smith A, Brown P, Lynch P, Brown J . Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(4):714-24. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.078. View

5.
Stiel S, Pollok A, Elsner F, Lindena G, Ostgathe C, Nauck F . Validation of the Symptom and Problem Checklist of the German Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation (HOPE). J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011; 43(3):593-605. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.021. View