» Articles » PMID: 39050269

Exoskeleton Kinematic Design Robustness: An Assessment Method to Account for Human Variability

Overview
Date 2024 Jul 25
PMID 39050269
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Exoskeletons are wearable devices intended to physically assist one or multiple human joints in executing certain activities. From a mechanical point of view, they are kinematic structures arranged in parallel to the biological joints. In order to allow the users to move while assisted, it is crucial to avoid mobility restrictions introduced by the exoskeleton's kinematics. Passive degrees of freedom and other self-alignment mechanisms are a common option to avoid any restrictions. However, the literature lacks a systematic method to account for large inter- and intra-subject variability in designing and assessing kinematic chains. To this end, we introduce a model-based method to assess the kinematics of exoskeletons by representing restrictions in mobility as disturbances and undesired forces at the anchor points. The method makes use of robotic kinematic tools and generates useful insights to support the design process. Though an application on a back-support exoskeleton designed for lifting tasks is illustrated, the method can describe any type of rigid exoskeleton. A qualitative pilot trial is conducted to assess the kinematic model that proved to predict kinematic configurations associated to rising undesired forces recorded at the anchor points, that give rise to mobility restrictions and discomfort on the users.

Citing Articles

From the idea to the user: a pragmatic multifaceted approach to testing occupational exoskeletons.

Di Natali C, Poliero T, Sposito M, Fanti V, Leggieri S, Caldwell D Wearable Technol. 2025; 6:e5.

PMID: 39935597 PMC: 11810522. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2024.28.


Design and validation of a wearable dynamometry system for knee extension-flexion torque measurement.

Park S, Myong Y, Cho M, Cho S, Lee W, Oh B Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):10428.

PMID: 38714762 PMC: 11076506. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60985-9.


Development of Quasi-Passive Back-Support Exoskeleton with Compact Variable Gravity Compensation Module and Bio-Inspired Hip Joint Mechanism.

Song G, Moon J, Kim J, Lee G Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(3).

PMID: 38534859 PMC: 10968377. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9030173.


Challenges and solutions for application and wider adoption of wearable robots.

Babic J, Laffranchi M, Tessari F, Verstraten T, Novak D, Sarabon N Wearable Technol. 2024; 2:e14.

PMID: 38486636 PMC: 10936284. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2021.13.


Versatile and non-versatile occupational back-support exoskeletons: A comparison in laboratory and field studies.

Poliero T, Sposito M, Toxiri S, Di Natali C, Iurato M, Sanguineti V Wearable Technol. 2024; 2:e12.

PMID: 38486626 PMC: 10936340. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2021.9.


References
1.
Schiele A, van der Helm F . Kinematic design to improve ergonomics in human machine interaction. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2006; 14(4):456-69. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2006.881565. View

2.
de Looze M, Bosch T, Krause F, Stadler K, OSullivan L . Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics. 2015; 59(5):671-81. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1081988. View

3.
Kermavnar T, Power V, de Eyto A, OSullivan L . Computerized Cuff Pressure Algometry as Guidance for Circumferential Tissue Compression for Wearable Soft Robotic Applications: A Systematic Review. Soft Robot. 2018; 5(1):1-16. DOI: 10.1089/soro.2017.0046. View

4.
Toxiri S, Koopman A, Lazzaroni M, Ortiz J, Power V, de Looze M . Rationale, Implementation and Evaluation of Assistive Strategies for an Active Back-Support Exoskeleton. Front Robot AI. 2021; 5:53. PMC: 7805873. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00053. View