» Articles » PMID: 39048596

Identifying an Immunosenescence-associated Gene Signature in Gastric Cancer by Integrating Bulk and Single-cell Sequencing Data

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Jul 24
PMID 39048596
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has been believed that immunosenescence plays a crucial role in tumorigenesis and cancer therapy. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of understanding regarding its role in determining clinical outcomes and therapy selection for gastric cancer patients, due to the lack of a feasible immunosenescence signature. Therefore, this research aims to develop a gene signature based on immunosenescence, which is used for stratification of gastric cancer. By integrative analysis of bulk transcriptome and single-cell data, we uncovered immunosenescence features in gastric cancer. Random forest algorithm was used to select hub genes and multivariate Cox algorithm was applied to construct a scoring system to evaluate the prognosis and the response to immunotherapy and chemotherapy. The Cancer Genome Atlas of Stomach Adenocarcinoma (TCGA-STAD) cohort was implemented as the training cohort and two independent cohorts from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database were used for validation. The model was further tested by our Fudan cohort. In this study, immunosenescence was identified as a hallmark of gastric cancer that is linked with transcriptomic features, genomic variations, and distinctive tumor microenvironment (TME). Four immunosenescence genes, including APOD, ADIPOR2, BRAF, and C3, were screened out to construct a gene signature for risk stratification. Higher risk scores indicated strong predictive power for poorer overall survival. Notably, the risk score signature could reliably predict response to chemotherapy and immunotherapy, with patients with high scores benefiting from immunotherapy and patients with low scores responding to chemotherapy. We report immunosenescence as a hitherto unheralded hallmark of gastric cancer that affects prognosis and treatment efficiency.

Citing Articles

Integrating multiomics analysis and machine learning to refine the molecular subtyping and prognostic analysis of stomach adenocarcinoma.

Wang M, He Q, Chen Z, Qin Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3843.

PMID: 39885324 PMC: 11782604. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87444-3.


Temporal and spatial trends in gastric cancer burden in the USA from 1990 to 2021: findings from the global burden of disease study 2021.

Zhan C, Qiu B, Wang J, Li Y, Yu J Front Oncol. 2025; 14:1499384.

PMID: 39744003 PMC: 11688243. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1499384.

References
1.
Racle J, de Jonge K, Baumgaertner P, Speiser D, Gfeller D . Simultaneous enumeration of cancer and immune cell types from bulk tumor gene expression data. Elife. 2017; 6. PMC: 5718706. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.26476. View

2.
Liu Y, Zhao H . Variable importance-weighted Random Forests. Quant Biol. 2018; 5(4):338-351. PMC: 6051549. View

3.
Mayakonda A, Lin D, Assenov Y, Plass C, Koeffler H . Maftools: efficient and comprehensive analysis of somatic variants in cancer. Genome Res. 2018; 28(11):1747-1756. PMC: 6211645. DOI: 10.1101/gr.239244.118. View

4.
Friscic J, Bottcher M, Reinwald C, Bruns H, Wirth B, Popp S . The complement system drives local inflammatory tissue priming by metabolic reprogramming of synovial fibroblasts. Immunity. 2021; 54(5):1002-1021.e10. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.03.003. View

5.
Kim S, Cristescu R, Bass A, Kim K, Odegaard J, Kim K . Comprehensive molecular characterization of clinical responses to PD-1 inhibition in metastatic gastric cancer. Nat Med. 2018; 24(9):1449-1458. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0101-z. View