» Articles » PMID: 39045264

Primary Motor Area Activity in Phantom Limb Imagery of Traumatic Unilateral Lower Limb Amputees With Phantom Limb Pain

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2024 Jul 24
PMID 39045264
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Estimates of the worldwide increase in amputees raises the awareness to solve long-standing problems. Understanding the functional brain modifications after a lower limb amputation (LLA) is one of the first steps towards proposing new rehabilitation approaches. Functional modifications in the central nervous system due the amputation could be involved in prosthesis use failures and Phantom Limb Pain (PLP), increasing costs and overwhelming the health services.

Objective: This study analyses orphan primary motor area (M1-Orphan) hemodynamic and metabolic behaviour, which previously controlled the limb that was amputated, in comparison with the M1-Preserved, responsible for the intact limb (IL) during phantom limb imagery moving during Mirror Therapy (MT), compared to Isolated Intact Limb Movement Task (I-ILMT).

Methodology: A case-control study with unilateral traumatic LLA with moderate PLP who measured [oxy-Hb] and [deoxy-Hb] in the M1 area by Functional Near InfraredSpectroscopy (fNIRS) during the real (I-ILMT) and MT task.

Results: Sixty-five patients, with 67.69% of men, young (40.32 ± 12.91), 65.63% amputated due motorcycle accidents, 4.71 ± 7.38 years ago, predominantly above the knee (57.14%). The M1 activation in the orphan cortex did not differ from the activation in the intact cortex during MT ( > .05).

Conclusion: The perception of the Phantom limb moving or intact limb moving is metabolically equivalent in M1, even in the absence of a limb. In other words, the amputation does not alter the brain metabolism in control of phantom movement.

Citing Articles

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Diagnostic Processes and Comprehensive Multimodal Models in Pain Medicine.

Cascella M, Leoni M, Shariff M, Varrassi G J Pers Med. 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39338237 PMC: 11432921. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14090983.

References
1.
Heyns A, Jacobs S, Negrini S, Patrini M, Rauch A, Kiekens C . Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Individuals With Amputation: Identification of Best Evidence for Rehabilitation to Develop the WHO's Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021; 102(6):1191-1197. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.11.019. View

2.
Herrera-Moreno D, Carvajal-Ovalle D, Cueva-Nunez M, Acevedo C, Riveros-Munevar F, Camacho K . Body image, perceived stress, and resilience in military amputees of the internal armed conflict in Colombia. Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2020; 11(2):56-62. PMC: 7110278. DOI: 10.21500/20112084.3487. View

3.
Mavroforou A, Malizos K, Karachalios T, Chatzitheofilou K, Giannoukas A . Punitive limb amputation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472(10):3102-6. PMC: 4160514. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3480-6. View

4.
Makin T, Flor H . Brain (re)organisation following amputation: Implications for phantom limb pain. Neuroimage. 2020; 218:116943. PMC: 7422832. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116943. View

5.
McDonald C, Westcott-McCoy S, Weaver M, Haagsma J, Kartin D . Global prevalence of traumatic non-fatal limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2020; 45(2):105-114. DOI: 10.1177/0309364620972258. View