» Articles » PMID: 39044849

How the CAHPS Clinician and Group Patient Experience Survey Data Have Been Used in Research: A Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Jul 24
PMID 39044849
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Patient experience is a key aspect of care quality. The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS) survey measures experiences with ambulatory care providers to inform public reporting, pay-for-performance initiatives, interventions, patient choice of physicians/practices, and quality improvement. Since the survey's 2007 release, no systematic review of its use in research has been published.

Methods: We reviewed English-language, peer-reviewed articles published since 2008 using CG-CAHPS survey data in the U.S. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and used the Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies.

Results: We examined 126 articles and included 52. Twenty-seven articles focused on general primary care, and the others focused on ambulatory specialty care. Of the 52 studies, 37 were cross-sectional, and the majority conducted patient-level regression analysis, controlling for patient characteristics. The most-used CAHPS measures were overall provider rating and the provider communication composite. CG-CAHPS data were primarily utilized to evaluate interventions (24 studies) and examine cross-sectional associations (21 studies) of site-level (eg, organizational climate), provider-level (physician empathy), and patient-level (medication adherence) factors with patient experience. Four studies reported disparities in patient experience.

Conclusions: The widespread use of CG-CAHPS data implies the survey's value in measuring and improving care quality. Unlike facility or plan surveys, the CG-CAHPS survey was designed to allow attribution to medical groups and clinicians, which, as evidence shows, is its main strength. Policymakers, researchers, clinicians, and health care leaders can leverage CG-CAHPS data in quality improvement efforts and interventions supporting patient-centered care.

Citing Articles

Patient Experience in Older Adults with Diabetes: A Narrative Review on Interventions to Improve Patient Experience and Research Gaps.

Hamasaki H Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 12(24.

PMID: 39765957 PMC: 11675409. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12242530.


Does an "EZ" Survey Improve the Data Quality of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group Survey 3.1?.

Hays R, Brown J, Mikail C, Quigley D J Patient Exp. 2024; 11:23743735241297622.

PMID: 39553387 PMC: 11565615. DOI: 10.1177/23743735241297622.


Associations of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group Survey Scores with Interventions and Site, Provider, and Patient Factors: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Quigley D, Elliott M, Qureshi N, Predmore Z, Hays R J Patient Exp. 2024; 11:23743735241283204.

PMID: 39403289 PMC: 11472368. DOI: 10.1177/23743735241283204.


Patient Surveys Are Used Most Often to Assess Health Care Innovations, Rigorous Methods Are Less Common.

Qureshi N, Quigley D Am J Med Qual. 2024; 39(4):188-196.

PMID: 38976453 PMC: 11269007. DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000197.

References
1.
Dorr D, Anastas T, Ramsey K, Wagner J, Sachdeva B, Michaels L . Effect of a Pragmatic, Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial on Patient Experience With Care: The Transforming Outcomes for Patients Through Medical Home Evaluation and reDesign (TOPMED) Study. Med Care. 2016; 54(8):745-51. PMC: 4945405. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000552. View

2.
Boissy A, Windover A, Bokar D, Karafa M, Neuendorf K, Frankel R . Communication Skills Training for Physicians Improves Patient Satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 2016; 31(7):755-61. PMC: 4907940. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-016-3597-2. View

3.
Prasad T, Buta E, Cleary P . Is Patient-Physician Gender Concordance Related to the Quality of Patient Care Experiences?. J Gen Intern Med. 2021; 36(10):3058-3063. PMC: 8481522. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06411-y. View

4.
Swankoski K, Peikes D, Dale S, Clusen N, Morrison N, Holland J . Patient experience midway through a large primary care practice transformation initiative. Am J Manag Care. 2017; 23(3):178-184. View

5.
Bernstein D, Jones C, Flemister A, DiGiovanni B, Baumhauer J . Does Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Use at New Foot and Ankle Patient Clinic Visits Improve Patient Activation, Experience, and Satisfaction?. Foot Ankle Int. 2023; 44(6):481-487. DOI: 10.1177/10711007231163119. View