» Articles » PMID: 39043817

Impacts of Keratoconus on Quality of Life: a Qualitative Study

Overview
Journal Eye (Lond)
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2024 Jul 23
PMID 39043817
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/aims: To identify the domains of quality of life (QoL) in people with keratoconus.

Methods: Semi structured in-depth in person and telephone interviews were conducted with participants diagnosed with keratoconus and recruited from the Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Thematic analysis of interview content was conducted using inductive and deductive processes. Data was collected until thematic saturation was obtained.

Results: 33 patients with keratoconus with median age 37 (range 18 to 65) years and majority male (n = 25; 75.8%) were interviewed and a total of 2551 quotes coded. Thematic analysis resulted in 7 broad themes, Driving (199 references), Career (259 references), Symptoms (647 references), Enjoyment (149 references), Relationships (250 references), Financial (104 references) and Healthcare (881 references). Most references described a negative relationship between keratoconus and these 7 domains. The diverse QoL issues expressed included frustration with treatment effectiveness, fear of disease progression, inconvenience with contact lenses, forced career changes and job loss, cost of contact lenses, and feelings of isolation and discrimination. Themes and subthemes described a complex and varied relationship between keratoconus and QoL.

Conclusion: Severe quality of life impairment was experienced by keratoconus patients despite treatment. Keratoconus diminishes various aspects of individual's QoL. Therapies able to improve QoL are still needed for keratoconus.

Citing Articles

Assessment of awareness of keratoconus and its relation to eye rubbing among Saudi Arabia population.

Alqasimi N, Aljohani L, Ambrosio Jr R, AlQahtani B, Al Haydar N, Alanazi B Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2025; 5:1545030.

PMID: 40008187 PMC: 11850373. DOI: 10.3389/fopht.2025.1545030.


Depression among keratoconus patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Moshfeghinia R, Arman A, Sobhi N, Mahmoudinezhad G, Molavi Vardanjani H Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1477411.

PMID: 39651480 PMC: 11621007. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1477411.

References
1.
Wagner H, Barr J, Zadnik K . Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study: methods and findings to date. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2007; 30(4):223-32. PMC: 3966142. DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2007.03.001. View

2.
Kandel H, Pesudovs K, Watson S . Measurement of Quality of Life in Keratoconus. Cornea. 2019; 39(3):386-393. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002170. View

3.
Yeung S, Lichtinger A, Kim P, Amiran M, Rootman D . Retrospective contralateral study comparing deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with penetrating keratoplasty: a patient's perspective. Can J Ophthalmol. 2012; 47(4):360-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.04.002. View

4.
Hersh P, Stulting R, Muller D, Durrie D, Rajpal R . United States Multicenter Clinical Trial of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Keratoconus Treatment. Ophthalmology. 2017; 124(9):1259-1270. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.052. View

5.
Versace V, Skinner T, Bourke L, Harvey P, Barnett T . National analysis of the Modified Monash Model, population distribution and a socio-economic index to inform rural health workforce planning. Aust J Rural Health. 2021; 29(5):801-810. DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12805. View