» Articles » PMID: 39043046

The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of the Combination of Tumor M2-Pyruvate Kinase, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, and Cytokeratin 19 Fragment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Finding biomarkers related to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is helpful for the diagnosis and precise treatment of lung cancer. The relationship between serum tumor M2-pyruvate kinase (TuM2-PK), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1) and NSCLC was analyzed. The serum levels of TuM2-PK, CEA, and CYFRA21-1 in 184 patients with the NSCLC group, 60 patients with the benign lung disease (BLD) group, and 90 healthy controls (HC) group were detected. The levels of TuM2-PK were measured by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The detection methods of CEA and CYFRA21-1 were electrochemiluminescence. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate the diagnostic value of TuM2-PK, CEA, and CYFRA21-1 on NSCLC. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was drawn to evaluate the survival status in NSCLC patients with different serum levels of TuM2-PK, CEA, and CYFRA21-1. Serum levels of TuM2-PK, CEA, and CYFRA21-1 in the NSCLC group were significantly higher than those in the BLD group and the HC group ( < .01). Serum levels of TuM2-PK, CEA, and CYFRA21-1 in NSCLC patients were associated with the tumor lymph node metastasis stage ( < .05), lymph node metastasis ( < .05), and distant metastasis ( < .05). The ROC curve showed that the area under the curve of serum levels of TuM2-PK, CEA, and CYFRA21-1 was 0.814, 0.638, and 0.719, respectively, and that the combination of the above 3 was 0.918. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rate in NSCLC patients with positive TuM2-PK, CEA, and CYFRA21-1 was significantly lower than that in NSCLC patients with negative TuM2-PK, CEA, and CYFRA21-1, respectively ( < .05). Serum TuM2-PK, CEA, and CYFRA21-1 levels have high clinical values in the diagnosis of NSCLC, and can effectively judge the prognosis of patients.

References
1.
Liu J, Zhu H, Jiang H, Zhang H, Wu D, Hu X . Tumor M2 pyruvate kinase in diagnosis of nonsmall cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis based on Chinese population. J Cancer Res Ther. 2015; 11 Suppl 1:C104-6. DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.163857. View

2.
Bandara I, Baltatzis M, Sanyal S, Siriwardena A . Evaluation of tumor M2-pyruvate kinase (Tumor M2-PK) as a biomarker for pancreatic cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2018; 16(1):56. PMC: 5853155. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-018-1360-3. View

3.
Sriram K, Larsen J, Yang I, Bowman R, Fong K . Genomic medicine in non-small cell lung cancer: paving the path to personalized care. Respirology. 2010; 16(2):257-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01892.x. View

4.
Luftner D, Mazurek S, Henschke P, Mesterharm J, Schildhauer S, Geppert R . Plasma levels of HER-2/neu, tumor type M2 pyruvate kinase and its tyrosine-phosphorylated metabolite in advanced breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2003; 23(2A):991-7. View

5.
Li J, Chen Y, Wang X, Wang C, Xiao M . The value of combined detection of CEA, CYFRA21-1, SCC-Ag, and pro-GRP in the differential diagnosis of lung cancer. Transl Cancer Res. 2022; 10(4):1900-1906. PMC: 8797414. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-21-527. View