» Articles » PMID: 39042880

Optimizing the Post-CAR T Monitoring Period in Recipients of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel, Tisagenlecleucel, and Lisocabtagene Maraleucel

Abstract

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies, including axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), have transformed the treatment landscape for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, showcasing significant efficacy but also highlighting toxicity risks such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). The US Food and Drug Administration has mandated patients remain close to the treatment center for 4 weeks as part of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy to monitor and manage these toxicities, which, although cautious, may add to cost of care, be burdensome for patients and their families, and present challenges related to patient access and socioeconomic disparities. This retrospective study across 9 centers involving 475 patients infused with axi-cel, tisa-cel, and liso-cel from 2018 to 2023 aimed to assess CRS and ICANS onset and duration, as well as causes of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in real-world CAR T recipients. Although differences were noted in the incidence and duration of CRS and ICANS between CAR T products, new-onset CRS and ICANS are exceedingly rare after 2 weeks after infusion (0% and 0.7% of patients, respectively). No new cases of CRS occurred after 2 weeks and a single case of new-onset ICANS occurred in the third week after infusion. NRM is driven by ICANS in the early follow-up period (1.1% until day 28) and then by infection through 3 months after infusion (1.2%). This study provides valuable insights into optimizing CAR T therapy monitoring, and our findings may provide a framework to reduce physical and financial constraints for patients.

Citing Articles

Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Efficacy, Safety, and Place in Therapy.

Goel U, Zanwar S, Cowan A, Banerjee R, Khouri J, Dima D Cancer Manag Res. 2025; 17:357-372.

PMID: 39990276 PMC: 11847446. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S510408.


Too short or unnecessarily long: walking the fine line.

Sainatham C, Jain T Blood Adv. 2024; 8(20):5430-5432.

PMID: 39405073 PMC: 11526071. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013812.

References
1.
Alexander M, Culos K, Roddy J, Shaw J, Bachmeier C, Shigle T . Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Efficacy, Toxicity, and Best Practices for Outpatient Administration. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021; 27(7):558-570. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.01.014. View

2.
Jacobson C, Locke F, Ma L, Asubonteng J, Hu Z, Siddiqi T . Real-World Evidence of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for the Treatment of Large B Cell Lymphoma in the United States. Transplant Cell Ther. 2022; 28(9):581.e1-581.e8. PMC: 9427701. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.05.026. View

3.
Hill J, Seo S . How I prevent infections in patients receiving CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cells for B-cell malignancies. Blood. 2020; 136(8):925-935. PMC: 7441168. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2019004000. View

4.
Iacoboni G, Villacampa G, Martinez-Cibrian N, Bailen R, Lopez Corral L, Sanchez J . Real-world evidence of tisagenlecleucel for the treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Med. 2021; 10(10):3214-3223. PMC: 8124109. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3881. View

5.
Munshi N, Anderson Jr L, Shah N, Madduri D, Berdeja J, Lonial S . Idecabtagene Vicleucel in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(8):705-716. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024850. View