The Hidden Value of MRI: Modifying Treatment Decisions in C-spine Injuries

Overview

Journal Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Emergency Medicine

Date 2024 Jul 22

PMID 39039608

Authors

Niklas Rutsch

Florian Schmaranzer

Pascale Amrein

Martin Muller

Christoph E Albers

Sebastian F Bigdon

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background Data: Computed Tomography (CT) is the gold standard for cervical spine (c-spine) evaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) emerges due to its increasing availability and the lack of radiation exposure. However, MRI is costly and time-consuming, questioning its role in the emergency department (ED). This study investigates the added the value of an additional MRI for patients presenting with a c-spine injury in the ED.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective monocenter cohort study that included all patients with neck trauma presenting in the ED, who received imaging based on the NEXUS criteria. Spine surgeons performed a full-case review to classify each case into "c-spine injured" and "c-spine uninjured". Injuries were classified according to the AO Spine classification. We assessed patients with a c-spine injury detected by CT, who received a subsequent MRI. In this subset, injuries were classified separately in both imaging modalities. We monitored the treatment changes after the additional MRI to evaluate characteristics of this cohort and the impact of the AO Spine Neurology/Modifier modifiers.

Results: We identified 4496 subjects, 2321 were eligible for inclusion and 186 were diagnosed with c-spine injuries in the retrospective case review. Fifty-six patients with a c-spine injury initially identified through CT received an additional MRI. The additional MRI significantly extended (geometric mean ratio 1.32, p < 0.001) the duration of the patients' stay in the ED. Of this cohort, 25% had a change in treatment strategy and among the patients with neurological symptoms (AON ≥ 1), 45.8% experienced a change in treatment. Patients that were N-positive, had a 12.4 (95% CI 2.7-90.7, p < 0.01) times higher odds of a treatment change after an additional MRI than neurologically intact patients.

Conclusion And Relevance: Our study suggests that patients with a c-spine injury and neurological symptoms benefit from an additional MRI. In neurologically intact patients, an additional MRI retains value only when carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Citing Articles

[Which diagnostic tests are indicated in the emergency department after trauma to the cervical spine?].

Riesenbeck O, Raschke M Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2025; 128(2):75-80.

PMID: 39760888 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-024-01520-3.

References

Schroeder G, Canseco J, Patel P, Divi S, Karamian B, Kandziora F . Establishing the Injury Severity of Subaxial Cervical Spine Trauma: Validating the Hierarchical Nature of the AO Spine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020; 46(10):649-657. PMC: 8057527. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003873. View

Griffen M, Frykberg E, Kerwin A, Schinco M, Tepas J, Rowe K . Radiographic clearance of blunt cervical spine injury: plain radiograph or computed tomography scan?. J Trauma. 2003; 55(2):222-6; discussion 226-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.TA.0000083332.93868.E2. View

Deyle S, Wagner A, Benneker L, Jeger V, Eggli S, Bonel H . Could full-body digital X-ray (LODOX-Statscan) screening in trauma challenge conventional radiography?. J Trauma. 2009; 66(2):418-22. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818a5d1a. View

Duane T, Young A, Vanguri P, Wolfe L, Katzen J, Han J . Defining the cervical spine clearance algorithm: A single-institution prospective study of more than 9,000 patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016; 81(3):541-7. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001151. View

Schmidt O, Gahr R, Gosse A, Heyde C . ATLS(R) and damage control in spine trauma. World J Emerg Surg. 2009; 4:9. PMC: 2660300. DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-4-9. View

Bigdon S, Hecht V, Fairhurst P, Deml M, Exadaktylos A, Albers C . Injuries in alpine summer sports - types, frequency and prevention: a systematic review. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022; 14(1):79. PMC: 9063189. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-022-00468-4. View

von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61(4):344-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008. View

Nguyen G, Clark R . Adequacy of plain radiography in the diagnosis of cervical spine injuries. Emerg Radiol. 2004; 11(3):158-61. DOI: 10.1007/s10140-004-0351-6. View

Kebaish K, Galivanche A, Mercier M, Varthi A, Rubin L, Grauer J . Is There Utility to Requiring Spine MRI Pre-authorizations? Pre-authorizations: A Single Institution's Perspective. Clin Spine Surg. 2023; 36(5):186-189. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001422. View

10.

Fisher A, Young W . Is the lateral cervical spine x-ray obsolete during the initial evaluation of patients with acute trauma?. Surg Neurol. 2008; 70(1):53-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.08.011. View

11.

McCulloch P, France J, Jones D, Krantz W, Nguyen T, Chambers C . Helical computed tomography alone compared with plain radiographs with adjunct computed tomography to evaluate the cervical spine after high-energy trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(11):2388-94. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00208. View

12.

Woodring J, Lee C . Limitations of cervical radiography in the evaluation of acute cervical trauma. J Trauma. 1993; 34(1):32-9. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199301000-00006. View

13.

Oliver M, Inaba K, Tang A, Branco B, Barmparas G, Schnuriger B . The changing epidemiology of spinal trauma: a 13-year review from a Level I trauma centre. Injury. 2012; 43(8):1296-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.04.021. View

14.

Rutsch N, Amrein P, Exadaktylos A, Benneker L, Schmaranzer F, Muller M . Cervical spine trauma - Evaluating the diagnostic power of CT, MRI, X-Ray and LODOX. Injury. 2023; 54(7):110771. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.05.003. View

15.

Badhiwala J, Lai C, Alhazzani W, Farrokhyar F, Nassiri F, Meade M . Cervical spine clearance in obtunded patients after blunt traumatic injury: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162(6):429-37. DOI: 10.7326/M14-2351. View

16.

Diaz Jr J, Gillman C, Morris Jr J, May A, Carrillo Y, Guy J . Are five-view plain films of the cervical spine unreliable? A prospective evaluation in blunt trauma patients with altered mental status. J Trauma. 2003; 55(4):658-63. DOI: 10.1097/01.TA.0000088120.99247.4A. View

17.

Spivak J, Weiss M, COTLER J, Call M . Cervical spine injuries in patients 65 and older. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994; 19(20):2302-6. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199410150-00009. View

18.

Bailitz J, Starr F, Beecroft M, Bankoff J, Roberts R, Bokhari F . CT should replace three-view radiographs as the initial screening test in patients at high, moderate, and low risk for blunt cervical spine injury: a prospective comparison. J Trauma. 2009; 66(6):1605-9. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a5b0cc. View

19.

Gale S, Gracias V, Reilly P, Schwab C . The inefficiency of plain radiography to evaluate the cervical spine after blunt trauma. J Trauma. 2005; 59(5):1121-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000188632.79060.ba. View

20.

Onoue K, Farris C, Burley H, Sung E, Clement M, Abdalkader M . Role of cervical spine MRI in the setting of negative cervical spine CT in blunt trauma: Critical additional information in the setting of clinical findings suggestive of occult injury. J Neuroradiol. 2019; 48(3):164-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.05.001. View