» Articles » PMID: 39039293

Evaluation of Postoperative Esophagram Following Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2024 Jul 22
PMID 39039293
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The routine use of post-operative esophogram has come under evaluation for multiple upper GI surgeries such as with bariatric surgery and gastric resections. A major complication following Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is a leak from the myotomy site. A post-operative contrast esophogram is often utilized to evaluate the presence of a leak, however it is not a standardized care practice for all patients. Presently it is selectively performed depending on physician assessment intra-operatively. This project will evaluate the necessity of post-operative contrast esophogram following POEM.

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 277 patients diagnosed with achalasia who underwent POEM by two surgeons from 2011 to 2022. 173 patients met the inclusion criteria. A post-operative esophogram was used for the evaluation of a leak. Post-operative esophagram were selectively performed on day 1 following surgery using a water-soluble material. Data was evaluated using Stata.

Results: There were 3 detected leaks in the group that underwent esophagrams compared to the non-esophagram group in the early post-operative period. The overall complication rate was 5.5% in the non-esophagram versus 7.9% in the esophagram group. Length of stay was 1.48 days in the non-UGI vs 1.76 days in the esophagram group. Readmission rate was 10.9% in non-esophagram versus 8.7% in esophagram group.

Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes in patients undergoing POEM who received post-operative esophagram verses patients who did not receive post-operative esophagram. The routine use of a contrast esophogram to detect a leak following POEM may not be justified. This study suggests that esophagrams should be performed depending on the clinical signs/symptoms post-operatively that would warrant imaging and intervention.

References
1.
Sadowski D, Ackah F, Jiang B, Svenson L . Achalasia: incidence, prevalence and survival. A population-based study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010; 22(9):e256-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01511.x. View

2.
Cappell M, Stavropoulos S, Friedel D . Updated Systematic Review of Achalasia, with a Focus on POEM Therapy. Dig Dis Sci. 2019; 65(1):38-65. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05784-3. View

3.
Kahrilas P, Bredenoord A, Carlson D, Pandolfino J . Advances in Management of Esophageal Motility Disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 16(11):1692-1700. PMC: 6317712. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.026. View

4.
Ren Z, Zhong Y, Zhou P, Xu M, Cai M, Li L . Perioperative management and treatment for complications during and after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia (EA) (data from 119 cases). Surg Endosc. 2012; 26(11):3267-72. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2336-y. View

5.
Reddy C, Tavakkoli A, Abdul-Hussein M, Almazan E, Vosoughi K, Ichkhanian Y . Clinical impact of routine esophagram after peroral endoscopic myotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 93(1):102-106. PMC: 8783294. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.046. View