A Dilemma in the Management of Distal Tibia Fractures Solved by Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis Technique: A Prospective Study

Overview

Journal Cureus

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2024 Jul 22

PMID 39036152

Authors

Jerin Jeevo

Rajagopal Hp

Akhshay J George

Anoop Pilar

Madan Mohan Muniswamy

Binu Kurian

Mallikarjunaswamy Basappa

Rajkumar Amaravati

John Adarsh

Merwin Thomas

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction Managing distal tibia fractures is challenging for trauma surgeons because of their peculiar anatomy with less soft tissue coverage and poor blood supply. There are various treatment options for distal tibia fractures such as open reduction and plating, minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis, and intramedullary interlocking nailing. Open reduction and internal fixation can lead to excessive soft tissue dissection and devascularization of fracture fragments. We conducted a study on the functional outcome of distal tibia fractures treated by biological fixation with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis. Methods A total of 23 patients with distal one-third tibia fractures, fulfilling the inclusion criteria, who were treated at St. John's Medical College Hospital with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis between November 2020 and November 2022 were studied using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score at six weeks, three months, and six months postoperative follow-up. Results This study included 17 males and six females. The mean age of the study participants was 43.78 years, with most of the participants being in the age group between 51 and 60 years (29.2%, n = 7). All the study participants were employed. The mean operative time was two hours and 10 minutes. The mean duration for the radiological union was 22 weeks. The mean AOFAS score at six months was 92.43 + 5.696. There was only one case of superficial infection, which was treated with intravenous antibiotics. There were no cases of malunion/nonunion. Conclusion Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis is an effective treatment for distal tibia fractures avoiding most of the complications such as wound dehiscence and malunion/nonunion involved in conventional open reduction and internal fixation with plating. Therefore, we recommend this technique for all distal tibia fractures.

References

Yenna Z, Bhadra A, Ojike N, ShahulHameed A, Burden R, Voor M . Anterolateral and medial locking plate stiffness in distal tibial fracture model. Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32(6):630-7. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0630. View

Ruedi T . Fractures of the lower end of the tibia into the ankle joint: results 9 years after open reduction and internal fixation. Injury. 1973; 5(2):130-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(73)80089-0. View

Digby J, Holloway G, Webb J . A study of function after tibial cast bracing. Injury. 1983; 14(5):432-9. DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(83)90094-3. View

Lin Z, Zhang H, Luo G, Yao J, Xie H, Zhang X . Comparison of 3 Treatment Methods for Distal Tibial Fractures: A Network Meta-Analysis. Med Sci Monit. 2019; 25:7480-7487. PMC: 6792504. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.917311. View

Paluvadi S, Lal H, Mittal D, Vidyarthi K . Management of fractures of the distal third tibia by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis - A prospective series of 50 patients. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2015; 5(3):129-36. PMC: 4223765. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2014.07.010. View

Gupta P, Tiwari A, Thora A, Gandhi J, Jog V . Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) for Proximal and Distal Fractures of The Tibia: A Biological Approach. Malays Orthop J. 2017; 10(1):29-37. PMC: 5333700. DOI: 10.5704/MOJ.1603.006. View

Kitaoka H, Alexander I, Adelaar R, Nunley J, Myerson M, Sanders M . Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994; 15(7):349-53. DOI: 10.1177/107110079401500701. View

Guo J, Tang N, Yang H, Tang T . A prospective, randomised trial comparing closed intramedullary nailing with percutaneous plating in the treatment of distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92(7):984-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B7.22959. View

Costa M, Achten J, Hennings S, Boota N, Griffin J, Petrou S . Intramedullary nail fixation versus locking plate fixation for adults with a fracture of the distal tibia: the UK FixDT RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2018; 22(25):1-148. PMC: 5985455. DOI: 10.3310/hta22250. View

10.

Joveniaux P, Ohl X, Harisboure A, Berrichi A, Labatut L, Simon P . Distal tibia fractures: management and complications of 101 cases. Int Orthop. 2009; 34(4):583-8. PMC: 2903136. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0832-z. View

11.

Lai T, Fleming J . Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Distal Tibia Fractures. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2018; 35(2):223-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpm.2017.12.005. View

12.

Ahmad M, Sivaraman A, Zia A, Rai A, Patel A . Percutaneous locking plates for fractures of the distal tibia: our experience and a review of the literature. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 72(2):E81-7. DOI: 10.1097/ta.0b013e3181f140b3. View

13.

Ronga M, Longo U, Maffulli N . Minimally invasive locked plating of distal tibia fractures is safe and effective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 468(4):975-82. PMC: 2835592. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0991-7. View

14.

Kariya A, Jain P, Patond K, Mundra A . Outcome and complications of distal tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nails versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and the role of fibula fixation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020; 30(8):1487-1498. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-020-02726-y. View

15.

Lau T, Leung F, Chan C, Chow S . Wound complication of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in distal tibia fractures. Int Orthop. 2007; 32(5):697-703. PMC: 2551726. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0384-z. View

16.

Collinge C, Protzman R . Outcomes of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for metaphyseal distal tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2009; 24(1):24-9. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181ac3426. View