» Articles » PMID: 39035211

New Substituted Molecular Classifications of Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Characteristics and Probable Treatment Strategies

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Jul 22
PMID 39035211
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) is a heterogeneous tumor, and the accurate classification of GA is important. Previous classifications are based on molecular analysis and have not focused on GA with the primitive enterocyte phenotype (GAPEP), a unique subtype with a poor prognosis and frequent liver metastases. New substituted molecular (SM) classifications based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) are needed.

Methods: According to the IHC staining results, we divided 582 cases into six types: mismatch repair deficient (dMMR), Epstein-Barr virus associated (EBVa), the primitive enterocyte phenotype (PEP), the epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype, not otherwise specified/P53 mutated (NOS/P53m) and not otherwise specified/P53 wild-type (NOS/P53w). We analyzed the clinicopathological features, the immune microenvironment (PD-L1, CD8) and expression of HER2 and VEGFR2 of those types.

Results: There were 31 (5.3%) cases of the dMMR type, 13 (2.2%) cases of the EBVa type, 44 (7.6%) cases of the PEP type, 122 (21.0%) cases of the EMT type, 127 (21.8%) cases of the NOS/P53m type and 245 (42.1%) cases of the NOS/P53w type. Patients with the dMMR type had the best survival ( < 0.001). Patients with the EBVa type were younger ( < 0.001) and had higher PD-L1 and CD8 expression ( < 0.001) than other patients. Patients with the EMT type exhibited poor differentiation and a higher rate of abdominal metastasis. Patients with the NOS/P53m and PEP types had the worst survival rates and the highest PD-L1/HER2/VEGFR2 expression levels among all patients ( < 0.001).

Conclusion: Different SM classifications have different clinicopathological features and expression patterns, which indicate the probable clinical treatment strategies for these subtypes.

Citing Articles

Cancer-associated fibroblasts refine the classifications of gastric cancer with distinct prognosis and tumor microenvironment characteristics.

Gu L, Ding D, Wei C, Zhou D Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1158863.

PMID: 37404754 PMC: 10316023. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1158863.

References
1.
Hofmann M, Stoss O, Shi D, Buttner R, van de Vijver M, Kim W . Assessment of a HER2 scoring system for gastric cancer: results from a validation study. Histopathology. 2008; 52(7):797-805. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03028.x. View

2.
Cristescu R, Lee J, Nebozhyn M, Kim K, Ting J, Wong S . Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies subtypes associated with distinct clinical outcomes. Nat Med. 2015; 21(5):449-56. DOI: 10.1038/nm.3850. View

3.
Marrelli D, Polom K, Pascale V, Vindigni C, Piagnerelli R, De Franco L . Strong Prognostic Value of Microsatellite Instability in Intestinal Type Non-cardia Gastric Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 23(3):943-50. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4931-3. View

4.
. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2014; 513(7517):202-9. PMC: 4170219. DOI: 10.1038/nature13480. View

5.
Fuyuhiro Y, Yashiro M, Noda S, Kashiwagi S, Matsuoka J, Doi Y . Clinical significance of vimentin-positive gastric cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2010; 30(12):5239-43. View