» Articles » PMID: 39034327

Small Duct and Large Duct Type Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Reveal Distinct Patterns of Immune Signatures

Abstract

Purpose: Dedicated gene signatures in small (SD-iCCA) and large (LD-iCCA) duct type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remain unknown. We performed immune profiling in SD- and LD-iCCA to identify novel biomarker candidates for personalized medicine.

Methods: Retrospectively, 19 iCCA patients with either SD-iCCA (n = 10, median age, 63.1 years (45-86); men, 4) or LD-iCCA (n = 9, median age, 69.7 years (62-85); men, 5)) were included. All patients were diagnosed and histologically confirmed between 04/2009 and 01/2021. Tumor tissue samples were processed for differential expression profiling using NanoString nCounter® PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel.

Results: With the exception of complement signatures, immune-related pathways were broadly downregulated in SD-iCCA vs. LD-iCCA. A total of 20 immune-related genes were strongly downregulated in SD-iCCA with DMBT1 (log2fc = -5.39, p = 0.01) and CEACAM6 (log2fc = -6.38, p = 0.01) showing the strongest downregulation. Among 7 strongly (log2fc > 2, p ≤ 0.02) upregulated genes, CRP (log2fc = 5.06, p = 0.02) ranked first, and four others were associated with complement (C5, C4BPA, C8A, C8B). Total tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) signature was decreased in SD-iCCA with elevated ratios of exhausted-CD8/TILs, NK/TILs, and cytotoxic cells/TILs while having decreased ratios of B-cells/TILs, mast cells/TILs and dendritic cells/TILs. The immune profiling signatures in SD-iCCA revealed downregulation in chemokine signaling pathways inclulding JAK2/3 and ERK1/2 as well as nearly all cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction pathways with the exception of the CXCL1/CXCR1-axis.

Conclusion: Immune patterns differed in SD-iCCA versus LD-iCCA. We identified potential biomarker candidate genes, including CRP, CEACAM6, DMBT1, and various complement factors that could be explored for augmented diagnostics and treatment decision-making.

Citing Articles

New Relevant Evidence in Cholangiocarcinoma Biology and Characterization.

Porro N, Spinola-Lasso E, Pastore M, Caligiuri A, Di Tommaso L, Marra F Cancers (Basel). 2025; 16(24.

PMID: 39766138 PMC: 11674836. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16244239.

References
1.
Jing C, Fu Y, Yi Y, Zhang M, Zheng S, Huang J . HHLA2 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an immune checkpoint with prognostic significance and wider expression compared with PD-L1. J Immunother Cancer. 2019; 7(1):77. PMC: 6421676. DOI: 10.1186/s40425-019-0554-8. View

2.
Bisgaard H, Holmskov U, Santoni-Rugiu E, Nagy P, Nielsen O, Ott P . Heterogeneity of ductular reactions in adult rat and human liver revealed by novel expression of deleted in malignant brain tumor 1. Am J Pathol. 2002; 161(4):1187-98. PMC: 1867299. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64395-7. View

3.
Gerber T, Muller L, Bartsch F, Groger L, Schindeldecker M, Ridder D . Integrative Analysis of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Subtypes for Improved Patient Stratification: Clinical, Pathological, and Radiological Considerations. Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(13). PMC: 9264781. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133156. View

4.
Preusse C, Eede P, Heinzeling L, Freitag K, Koll R, Froehlich W . NanoString technology distinguishes anti-TIF-1γ from anti-Mi-2 dermatomyositis patients. Brain Pathol. 2021; 31(3):e12957. PMC: 8412076. DOI: 10.1111/bpa.12957. View

5.
Binnewies M, Roberts E, Kersten K, Chan V, Fearon D, Merad M . Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy. Nat Med. 2018; 24(5):541-550. PMC: 5998822. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0014-x. View