» Articles » PMID: 39030500

Subjective Social Status and Socio-demographic Correlates of Perceived Discrimination Among Older Adults in India

Overview
Journal BMC Geriatr
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2024 Jul 19
PMID 39030500
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Considering India's diversity, marked by differences in caste, class, ethnicity, religion, region, and language, discrimination can take on varying forms across social-structural locations. We examined the association between subjective social status (SSS) and perceived discrimination, and assessed the sociodemographic correlates of perceived discrimination among older persons in India.

Methods: Data come from the 2017-18 wave 1 of the Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI) with a sample of 30,253 adults 60 years or older. SSS was examined using the Macarthur scale with a ladder technique. Perceived discrimination was evaluated with the Everyday Discrimination Scale. Multivariable logistic regression models examined the odds of reporting discrimination by its types and attributions.

Results: 39% of older adults reported low SSS, whereas 7.3% reported high SSS. Older adults with low SSS had significantly higher odds of experiencing some discrimination than those with high SSS. Compared to high-SSS peers, low-SSS individuals attributed age, gender, caste, financial, and health status as reasons for discrimination. Older women attributed gender as a reason for discrimination. Caste was reported as a reason for discrimination by rural but not urban dwellers. Relative to northerners, those from southern India reported age, financial, and health statuses as reasons for discrimination.

Conclusions: That low-SSS older adults reported age, gender, caste, financial status, and health status as reasons for discrimination and that this association persisted after considering objective indicators of socioeconomic status (SES) is suggestive of SSS as independently consequential for perceived discrimination. These findings are useful for care providers and practitioners as they encourage older patients -- especially those with low SSS who may feel stigmatized -- to seek care, comply with care regimen, and engage in behaviors that protect and promote health.

References
1.
Denise E . Multiple disadvantaged statuses and health: the role of multiple forms of discrimination. J Health Soc Behav. 2014; 55(1):3-19. DOI: 10.1177/0022146514521215. View

2.
Pascoe E, Richman L . Perceived discrimination and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2009; 135(4):531-54. PMC: 2747726. DOI: 10.1037/a0016059. View

3.
Adler N, Epel E, Castellazzo G, Ickovics J . Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychol. 2000; 19(6):586-92. DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.586. View

4.
Abramson L, Seligman M, Teasdale J . Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. J Abnorm Psychol. 1978; 87(1):49-74. View

5.
Singh-Manoux A, Marmot M, Adler N . Does subjective social status predict health and change in health status better than objective status?. Psychosom Med. 2005; 67(6):855-61. DOI: 10.1097/01.psy.0000188434.52941.a0. View