» Articles » PMID: 39029923

An International Multi-institutional Validation of T1 Sub-staging of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-derived Pancreatic Cancer

Abstract

Background: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is resected at smaller sizes compared with its biologically distinct counterpart, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN)-derived PDAC. Thus, experts proposed T1 sub-staging for IPMN-derived PDAC. However, this has never been validated.

Methods: Consecutive upfront surgery patients with IPMN-derived PDAC from 5 international high-volume centers were classified by the proposed T1 sub-staging classification (T1a ≤0.5, T1b >0.5 and ≤1.0, and T1c >1.0 and ≤2.0 cm) using the invasive component size. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to compare overall survival (OS). A multivariable Cox regression was used to determine hazard ratios (HRs) with confidence intervals (95% CIs).

Results: Among 747 patients, 69 (9.2%), 50 (6.7%), 99 (13.0%), and 531 patients (71.1%), comprised the T1a, T1b, T1c, and T2-4 subgroups, respectively. Increasing T-stage was associated with elevated CA19-9, poorer grade, nodal positivity, R1 margin, and tubular subtype. Median OS for T1a, T1b, T1c, and T2-4 were 159.0 (95% CI = 126.0 to NR), 128.8 (98.3 to NR), 77.6 (48.3 to 108.2), and 31.4 (27.5 to 37.7) months, respectively (P < .001). OS decreased with increasing T-stage for all pairwise comparisons (all P < .05). After risk adjustment, older than age 65, elevated CA19-9, T1b [HR = 2.55 (1.22 to 5.32)], T1c [HR = 3.04 (1.60 to 5.76)], and T2-4 [HR = 3.41 (1.89 to 6.17)] compared with T1a, nodal positivity, R1 margin, and no adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with worse OS. Disease recurrence was more common in T2-4 tumors (56.4%) compared with T1a (18.2%), T1b (23.9%), and T1c (36.1%, P < .001).

Conclusion: T1 sub-staging of IPMN-derived PDAC is valid and has significant prognostic value. Advancing T1 sub-stage is associated with worse histopathology, survival, and recurrence. T1 sub-staging is recommended for future guidelines.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of AJCC Nodal Staging for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-Derived Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Habib J, Rompen I, Javed A, Sorrentino A, Riachi M, Cao W Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(13):8712-8720.

PMID: 39283575 PMC: 11549140. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16055-5.


ASO Author Reflections: Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-Derived Pancreatic Cancer: A Need to Evaluate for Specific Staging Systems.

Habib J, Rompen I, Javed A, Daamen L Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(13):8758-8759.

PMID: 39256311 PMC: 11549164. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16131-w.

References
1.
Habib J, Kinny-Koster B, Bou-Samra P, Alsaad R, Sereni E, Javed A . Surgical Decision-Making in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Modeling Prognosis Following Pancreatectomy in the Era of Induction and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2021; 277(1):151-158. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004915. View

2.
Aronsson L, Bengtsson A, Toren W, Andersson R, Ansari D . Intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma versus pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2019; 71:91-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.014. View

3.
Wood L, Canto M, Jaffee E, Simeone D . Pancreatic Cancer: Pathogenesis, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Gastroenterology. 2022; 163(2):386-402.e1. PMC: 9516440. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.056. View

4.
Muralidhar V, Nipp R, Mamon H, Punglia R, Hong T, Ferrone C . Association Between Very Small Tumor Size and Decreased Overall Survival in Node-Positive Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018; 25(13):4027-4034. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6832-8. View

5.
Koh Y, Chok A, Zheng H, Tan C, Goh B . Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the surgical outcomes of invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21(8):2782-800. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3639-0. View