» Articles » PMID: 39028323

Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: Machine Learning Models for Postoperative Complication Prediction

Overview
Journal J Anesth
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2024 Jul 19
PMID 39028323
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Managing children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) presents a significant challenge for anesthesiologists. Machine Learning (ML)-assisted tools have the potential to enhance the recognition of patients at risk of complications and predict potential issues, ultimately improving outcomes.

Methods: We evaluated the prediction capacity of six models, ranging from logistic regression to support vector machine, using a dataset comprising 33 variables and 1364 subjects. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) and the F1 score served as the primary evaluation metrics. Our primary objectives were twofold: first, to develop an effective prediction model, and second, to create a user-friendly comprehensive model for identifying high-risk patients.

Results: The logistic regression model demonstrated the highest effectiveness, achieving an AUC of 83.65%, and an F1 score of 0.7296, with balanced sensitivity and specificity of 77.94% and 76.47%, respectively. In comparison, the comprehensive three-layer decision tree model achieved an AUC of 72.84%, with sensitivity (79.41%) comparable to more complex models.

Conclusion: Our machine learning-assisted tools provide an additional perspective and enhance the predictive capabilities of traditional scoring methods. These tools can assist anesthesiologists in making well-informed decisions. Furthermore, we have successfully demonstrated the feasibility of creating a practical white-box model. The next steps involve conducting clinical validation and multicenter cross-validation.

Trial Registration: NCT05537168.

Citing Articles

Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Systematic Review of Use and Validation.

Kenig N, Monton Echeverria J, Muntaner Vives A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685566 PMC: 11642125. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237108.

References
1.
Kwon A, Marshall Z, Nabzdyk C . Why Anesthesiologists Could and Should Become the Next Leaders in Innovative Medical Entrepreneurism. Anesth Analg. 2017; 124(3):998-1004. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001793. View

2.
Lienhart A, Auroy Y, Pequignot F, Benhamou D, Warszawski J, Bovet M . Survey of anesthesia-related mortality in France. Anesthesiology. 2006; 105(6):1087-97. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200612000-00008. View

3.
Kadry B, Feaster W, Macario A, Ehrenfeld J . Anesthesia information management systems: past, present, and future of anesthesia records. Mt Sinai J Med. 2012; 79(1):154-65. DOI: 10.1002/msj.21281. View

4.
Deng F, Hickey J . Anesthesia Information Management Systems: An Underutilized Tool for Outcomes Research. AANA J. 2015; 83(3):189-95. View

5.
Murphy P . Measuring and recording outcome. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109(1):92-8. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes180. View