» Articles » PMID: 39026131

Re-thinging Embodied and Enactive Psychiatry: A Material Engagement Approach

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2024 Jul 18
PMID 39026131
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Emerging consensus among enactivist philosophers and embodied mind theorists suggests that seeking to understand mental illness we need to look out of our skulls at the ecology of the brain. Still, the complex links between materiality (in broadest sense of material objects, habits, practices and environments) and mental health remain little understood. This paper discusses the benefits of adopting a material engagement approach to embodied and enactive psychiatry. We propose that the material engagement approach can change the geography of the debate over the nature of mental disorders and through that help to develop theoretical and practical insights that could improve management and treatment for various psychiatric conditions. We investigate the potential role of Material Engagement Theory (MET) in psychiatry using examples of aetiologically different mental illnesses (schizophrenia and dementia) in respect of their shared phenomenological manifestations, focusing particularly on issues of memory, self-awareness, embodiment and temporality. The effective study of socio-material relations allows better understanding of the semiotic significance and agency of specific materials, environments and technical mediations. There is unrealised potential here for creating new approaches to treatment that can broaden, challenge or complement existing interventions and practices of care.

References
1.
Kleinman A . Anthropology and psychiatry. The role of culture in cross-cultural research on illness. Br J Psychiatry. 1987; 151:447-54. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.151.4.447. View

2.
WAPNER S, Demick J, REDONDO J . Cherished possessions and adaptation of older people to nursing homes. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1990; 31(3):219-35. DOI: 10.2190/GJPL-ATJY-KJA3-8C99. View

3.
Hutchins E . Cognitive ecology. Top Cogn Sci. 2014; 2(4):705-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01089.x. View

4.
Stephens A, Cheston R, Gleeson K . An exploration into the relationships people with dementia have with physical objects: an ethnographic study. Dementia (London). 2013; 12(6):697-712. DOI: 10.1177/1471301212442585. View

5.
Malafouris L . The brain-artefact interface (BAI): a challenge for archaeology and cultural neuroscience. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010; 5(2-3):264-73. PMC: 2894672. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsp057. View