Development of an Intervention for Patients Following an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: an Online Nominal Group Technique Consensus Study

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2024 Jul 18

PMID 39025812

Authors

Hayley Carter

David Beard

Paul Leighton

Fiona Moffatt

Benjamin E Smith

Kate E Webster

Phillipa Logan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: (1) To develop an intervention for to support patients diagnosed with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture with decision-making regarding treatment. (2) To define evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of patients following an ACL rupture.

Design: Nominal group technique consensus study.

Setting: Online meetings with patients and key stakeholders working and receiving treatment in the National Health Service, UK.

Participants: Consensus meetings composed of eight voting participants and five non-voting facilitators. Voting participants included five clinicians, one outpatient therapy manager and two patients with experience in an ACL rupture and reconstructive surgery. Non-voting facilitators supported group discussions and/or observed study procedures. This included a clinical academic expert, two methodology experts and two patient representatives.

Method: Two online meetings were held. Pre-elicitation material was distributed ahead of the first meeting. Premeeting voting was conducted ahead of both meetings. A draft of the shared decision-making intervention and recommendations were shared ahead of the second meeting. Components were discussed and ranked for inclusion based on a 70% agreement threshold.

Results: The meetings led to the development of a shared decision-making intervention to support treatment decision-making following an ACL rupture. The intervention includes two components: (1) a patient information leaflet and key questions diagram and (2) option grid. The evidence-based recommendations encompass core components of treatment reaching the 70% threshold agreed by the group. The recommendations cover: (1) advice and education, (2) exercise guidance, (3) intervention delivery, (4) outcome measure use and (5) shared decision-making.

Conclusion: This study has successfully developed a shared decision-making intervention to support ACL treatment decision-making, ready for testing in a future feasibility study. Evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of patients following ACL injury, ready for testing in a National Health Service (UK) setting, are also presented.

Trial Registration Number: NCT05529511.

References

Makoul G, Clayman M . An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2005; 60(3):301-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.010. View

Carter H, Webster K, Smith B . Current preoperative physiotherapy management strategies for patients awaiting Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR): A worldwide survey of physiotherapy practice. Knee. 2021; 28:300-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.12.018. View

Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson S, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby J . A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021; 374:n2061. PMC: 8482308. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n2061. View

May C, Cummings A, Girling M, Bracher M, Mair F, May C . Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2018; 13(1):80. PMC: 5992634. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0758-1. View

Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R . Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract. 2001; 50(460):892-9. PMC: 1313854. View

Moses B, Orchard J, Orchard J . Systematic review: Annual incidence of ACL injury and surgery in various populations. Res Sports Med. 2012; 20(3-4):157-79. DOI: 10.1080/15438627.2012.680633. View

Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry M, Bennett C, Eden K . Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 4:CD001431. PMC: 6478132. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5. View

Reijman M, Eggerding V, van Es E, van Arkel E, van den Brand I, van Linge J . Early surgical reconstruction versus rehabilitation with elective delayed reconstruction for patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture: COMPARE randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2021; 372:n375. PMC: 7941216. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n375. View

May C . Towards a general theory of implementation. Implement Sci. 2013; 8:18. PMC: 3602092. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-18. View

10.

Williamson P, Altman D, Blazeby J, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E . Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials. 2012; 13:132. PMC: 3472231. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-132. View

11.

Filbay S, Grindem H . Evidence-based recommendations for the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2019; 33(1):33-47. PMC: 6723618. DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2019.01.018. View

12.

Murphy M, Black N, Lamping D, McKEE C, Sanderson C, Askham J . Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess. 1998; 2(3):i-iv, 1-88. View

13.

Carter H, Beard D, Harvey A, Leighton P, Moffatt F, Smith B . Using normalisation process theory for intervention development, implementation and refinement in musculoskeletal and orthopaedic interventions: a qualitative systematic review. Implement Sci Commun. 2023; 4(1):114. PMC: 10506319. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00499-z. View

14.

Svantesson E, Hamrin Senorski E, Webster K, Karlsson J, Diermeier T, Rothrauff B . Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther symposium ACL injury clinical outcomes consensus group. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 28(8):2415-2434. PMC: 7429530. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06061-x. View

15.

Bateman M, Saunders B, Littlewood C, Hill J . Development of an optimised physiotherapist-led treatment protocol for lateral elbow tendinopathy: a consensus study using an online nominal group technique. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(12):e053841. PMC: 8712984. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053841. View

16.

Stacey D, Legare F, Pouliot S, Kryworuchko J, Dunn S . Shared decision making models to inform an interprofessional perspective on decision making: a theory analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 80(2):164-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.015. View

17.

Beard D, Davies L, Cook J, Stokes J, Leal J, Fletcher H . Rehabilitation versus surgical reconstruction for non-acute anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL SNNAP): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2022; 400(10352):605-615. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01424-6. View

18.

Elwyn G, OConnor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A . Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006; 333(7565):417. PMC: 1553508. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. View

19.

Frobell R, Roos E, Roos H, Ranstam J, Lohmander L . A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(4):331-42. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907797. View

20.

Elwyn G, Pickles T, Edwards A, Kinsey K, Brain K, Newcombe R . Supporting shared decision making using an Option Grid for osteoarthritis of the knee in an interface musculoskeletal clinic: A stepped wedge trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2015; 99(4):571-577. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.011. View