» Articles » PMID: 39021776

Understanding the Roles of Economy and Society in the Relative Risks of Zoonosis Emergence from Livestock

Overview
Journal R Soc Open Sci
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Jul 18
PMID 39021776
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The emergence of zoonotic infections that can develop into pathogens of pandemic potential is a major concern for public health. The risks of emergence and transmission relate to multiple factors that range from land use to human-non-human animal contacts. Livestock agriculture plays a potentially significant role in those risks, shaping landscapes and providing hosts that can act as the source or amplifiers of emergent pathogens. The relative risks will be contingent upon the nature of those systems, with comparisons often made between intensive, indoor, biosecure systems and more extensive, outdoor, insecure systems. Microbiological, ecological and veterinary sciences provide useful entry points in specifying and modelling some of the relative risks. Yet, they often do so with little regard for social science inputs and by making assumptions about social and economic conditions. In this article, we respond to recent analyses of relative risks by raising the importance of social and economic drivers of risk. We chart social science insights and research that materially alter the zoonotic risks associated with livestock production. Our purpose is to emphasize the requirement for full appreciation of the social, economic and political components of zoonotic and pandemic risk.

References
1.
Wegner G, A Murray K, Springmann M, Muller A, Sokolow S, Saylors K . Averting wildlife-borne infectious disease epidemics requires a focus on socio-ecological drivers and a redesign of the global food system. EClinicalMedicine. 2022; 47:101386. PMC: 9014132. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101386. View

2.
Jones K, Patel N, Levy M, Storeygard A, Balk D, Gittleman J . Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature. 2008; 451(7181):990-3. PMC: 5960580. DOI: 10.1038/nature06536. View

3.
Gilbert W, Thomas L, Coyne L, Rushton J . Review: Mitigating the risks posed by intensification in livestock production: the examples of antimicrobial resistance and zoonoses. Animal. 2021; 15(2):100123. DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100123. View

4.
Morens D, Folkers G, Fauci A . The challenge of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Nature. 2004; 430(6996):242-9. PMC: 7094993. DOI: 10.1038/nature02759. View

5.
Petrovan S, Aldridge D, Bartlett H, Bladon A, Booth H, Broad S . Post COVID-19: a solution scan of options for preventing future zoonotic epidemics. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021; 96(6):2694-2715. PMC: 8444924. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12774. View