Understanding Sexual Distress Related to Sexual Function (SDRSF): A Preliminary Framework Based on a Qualitative Study with Clinical Sexologists

Overview

Journal Int J Clin Health Psychol

Specialty Psychology

Date 2024 Jul 18

PMID 39021678

Authors

Catarina F Raposo

Pedro J Nobre

Andreia A Manao

Patricia M Pascoal

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Sexual distress related to sexual function (SDRSF) is pivotal in diagnosing sexual dysfunction. However, there is a lack of theoretical models for its comprehension and of knowledge concerning how to address it in clinical practice.

Aim: To contribute to theory building and clinical practice about SDRSF by collecting clinicians' accounts, aiming to inform a preliminary framework to study and intervene in SDRSF.

Method: Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze the data from 16 semi-structured interviews with clinical sexologists. Three main themes were created: (1) Burning from the inside, (2) Wicked games, and (3) Running up that hill. Participants revealed a multidimensional understanding of SDRSF in clinical settings that integrates individual, sociocultural, interpersonal and situational factors. This underscores the interconnected nature of SDRSF, revealing its links to different facets of overall distress in clinical settings. We present a preliminary framework that may be analytically generalized to enhance the comprehension of the specificities of SDRSF.

Conclusion: These insights frame a comprehensive conceptualization of SDRSF in clinical settings that goes beyond sexual activity and implies that interpersonal and societal factors need to be considered in research and intervention in this field.

References

Santos-Iglesias P, Mohamed B, Walker L . A Systematic Review of Sexual Distress Measures. J Sex Med. 2018; 15(5):625-644. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.02.020. View

Pretorius D, Mlambo M, Couper I . "We Are Not Truly Friendly Faces": Primary Health Care Doctors' Reflections on Sexual History Taking in North West Province. Sex Med. 2022; 10(6):100565. PMC: 9780778. DOI: 10.1016/j.esxm.2022.100565. View

Scappini A, Fioravanti G . Gender Scripts and Female Sexual Functioning: The Role of Sexual Pressure and Sexual Subjectivity. J Sex Res. 2022; 59(9):1110-1121. DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2022.2042477. View

Lafortune D, Girard M, Dussault E, Philibert M, Hebert M, Boislard M . Who seeks sex therapy? Sexual dysfunction prevalence and correlates, and help-seeking among clinical and community samples. PLoS One. 2023; 18(3):e0282618. PMC: 9987801. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282618. View

Perelman M . Commentary on the DSM-V considerations regarding premature ejaculation. J Sex Marital Ther. 2011; 37(2):145-50. DOI: 10.1080/0092623X.2011.547358. View

Pyke R . Sexual Performance Anxiety. Sex Med Rev. 2019; 8(2):183-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.07.001. View

Walker L, Santos-Iglesias P . On the Relationship Between Erectile Function and Sexual Distress in Men with Prostate Cancer. Arch Sex Behav. 2020; 49(5):1575-1588. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-019-01603-y. View

Marieke D, Joana C, Giovanni C, Erika L, Patricia P, Yacov R . Sexual Desire Discrepancy: A Position Statement of the European Society for Sexual Medicine. Sex Med. 2020; 8(2):121-131. PMC: 7261674. DOI: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.02.008. View

Goncalves W, Gherman B, Abdo C, Coutinho E, Nardi A, Appolinario J . Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in depressive and persistent depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Impot Res. 2022; 35(4):340-349. DOI: 10.1038/s41443-022-00539-7. View

10.

Dalgleish T, Black M, Johnston D, Bevan A . Transdiagnostic approaches to mental health problems: Current status and future directions. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020; 88(3):179-195. PMC: 7027356. DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000482. View

11.

Hendrickx L, Gijs L, Enzlin P . Who's Distressed by Sexual Difficulties? Exploring Associations Between Personal, Perceived Partner, and Relational Distress and Sexual Difficulties in Heterosexual Men and Women. J Sex Res. 2018; 56(3):300-313. DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2018.1493570. View

12.

Hendrickx L, Gijs L, Janssen E, Enzlin P . Predictors of Sexual Distress in Women With Desire and Arousal Difficulties: Distinguishing Between Personal, Partner, and Interpersonal Distress. J Sex Med. 2016; 13(11):1662-1675. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.09.016. View

13.

Forbes M, Baillie A, Eaton N, Krueger R . A Place for Sexual Dysfunctions in an Empirical Taxonomy of Psychopathology. J Sex Res. 2017; 54(4-5):465-485. PMC: 5433908. DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1269306. View

14.

Alarcao V, Ribeiro S, Almeida J, Giami A . Clinical Practice in Portuguese Sexology. J Sex Marital Ther. 2016; 43(8):760-773. DOI: 10.1080/0092623X.2016.1266537. View

15.

Pascoal P, Alvarez M, Pereira C, Nobre P . Development and Initial Validation of the Beliefs About Sexual Functioning Scale: A Gender Invariant Measure. J Sex Med. 2017; 14(4):613-623. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.01.021. View

16.

Yung S, Chen Y, Zawadzki M . Loneliness and psychological distress in everyday life among Latinx college students. J Am Coll Health. 2021; 71(5):1407-1416. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1927051. View

17.

Stephenson K, Truong L, Shimazu L . Why Is Impaired Sexual Function Distressing to Men? Consequences of Impaired Male Sexual Function and Their Associations With Sexual Well-Being. J Sex Med. 2018; 15(9):1336-1349. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.07.014. View

18.

Velten J, Margraf J . Exploring barriers and facilitators to women's intention and behavior to seek treatment for distressing sexual problems. PLoS One. 2023; 18(7):e0288205. PMC: 10353825. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288205. View

19.

Nickull S, Kallstrom M, Jern P . An Exploratory Network Analysis of Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction Comparing Partnered Cisgendered Men and Women. J Sex Med. 2022; 19(5):711-718. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.02.006. View

20.

Eley D, Bansal V, Leung J . Perfectionism as a mediator of psychological distress: Implications for addressing underlying vulnerabilities to the mental health of medical students. Med Teach. 2020; 42(11):1301-1307. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1805101. View