» Articles » PMID: 39021653

The Effects of Age and Gender and Elite Levels on Perceptual-cognitive Skills of Adolescent Badminton Athletes

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2024 Jul 18
PMID 39021653
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to examine perceptual-cognitive skills across age, gender and elite levels of badminton adolescent athletes.

Methods: A total of 57 badminton athletes divided into junior high school athletes (age = 13.36 ± 1.14 years, females = 22, males = 11) and senior high school athletes (age = 16.25 ± 0.84 years, females = 11, males = 13) were evaluated using a cognitive component skills approach. Elite levels were classified as semi-elite ( = 29, score = 3.23) and competitive elite ( = 28, score = 5.84) levels. Each group completed a cognitive test, including an evaluation of their capacity for Corsi block-tapping (CCT) and spatial priming tasks (SPT).

Results: No gender effects were found in the perceptual skills of the adolescent players, and the age effect was consistent across gender. For the elite levels, the perceptual-cognitive skills of SPT of reaction time was performed equally in the groups of semi-elite and competitive players, however, in the CCT Span of working-memory (WM), competitive-elite players outperformed semi-elite players.

Conclusion: We found that perceptual-cognitive skills of WM play crucial roles in the open-skill sports of badminton. Thus, when developing advanced skills to higher elite levels in adolescent players, perceptual-cognitive skills should be considered.

References
1.
Ishihara T, Kuroda Y, Mizuno M . Competitive achievement may be predicted by executive functions in junior tennis players: An 18-month follow-up study. J Sports Sci. 2018; 37(7):755-761. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1524738. View

2.
Phomsoupha M, Laffaye G . The science of badminton: game characteristics, anthropometry, physiology, visual fitness and biomechanics. Sports Med. 2015; 45(4):473-95. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-014-0287-2. View

3.
Kalen A, Bisagno E, Musculus L, Raab M, Perez-Ferreiros A, Williams A . The role of domain-specific and domain-general cognitive functions and skills in sports performance: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2022; 147(12):1290-1308. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000355. View

4.
Furley P, Memmert D . Working memory capacity as controlled attention in tactical decision making. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2012; 34(3):322-44. DOI: 10.1123/jsep.34.3.322. View

5.
Hill A, Laird A, Robinson J . Gender differences in working memory networks: a BrainMap meta-analysis. Biol Psychol. 2014; 102:18-29. PMC: 4157091. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.06.008. View